跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2016/11/007443
CTRI/2016/11/007443已完成未知

A prospective randomised clinical study comparing the outcome of 12F versus 24 F nephrostomy tube drainage post PCNL. - 12F vs 24 F nephrostomy drainage post PCNL.

niversity College of Medical Sciences University of Delhi Delhi0 个研究点目标入组 70 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
未知
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
70

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

入选标准

  • 1. Patients aged more than 18 to less than 70 years giving informed consent to participate in the study.
  • 2.Patients with renal stones in whom PCNL operation was indicated/necessary

排除标准

  • 1.Patient not consenting for inclusion in the above study.
  • 2.Patients with pregnancy, mental disorders or illness who cannot understand or comply with the study protocol.
  • 3.Patients in whom PCNL was contraindicated (uncorrected coagulopathy,CRF) , etc.
  • 4.Patients with large stone burden, stone size >3cm in size, staghorn calculus, bilateral renal stone, ureteric stones and multiple renal stones needing multiple tracts
  • 5.Patients with severe co morbidities (acute MI, bleeding diathesis, multi organ dysfunction)unfit for surgery/PCNL.

研究者

发起方
niversity College of Medical Sciences University of Delhi Delhi

相似试验

arrow(12F) bore versus wide bore(24F) nephrostomy... | 临床试验