Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Interventions
- Procedure: Submuscolar reconstructionProcedure: Prepectoral reconstruction
- Registration Number
- NCT05125991
- Lead Sponsor
- European Institute of Oncology
- Brief Summary
The study plans to compare conventional submuscular reconstruction with definitive implant and muscle sparing reconstruction with definitive implant in selected patients. The two techniques are compared in terms of patient quality of life and satisfaction; patient related outcomes, reconstruction morbidity, early and late complications are also investigated.
- Detailed Description
The study plans to compare conventional submuscular reconstruction with definitive implant and muscle sparing reconstruction with definitive implant in selected patients. The two techniques are compared in terms of patient quality of life and satisfaction; patient related outcomes, reconstruction morbidity, early and late complications are also investigated.
The study plans to collect robust data to support the prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage of implant with acellular dermal matrix in the clinical practice.
Consequently, the project plans to move toward evidence-based medicine in breast reconstruction, avoiding marketing influences and surgeon experience as the sole source of evidence.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 58
- Informed consent
- Not smokers
- No vascular comorbidities (diabetic, vasculitis, coagulation disorders)
- BMI<30
- CUP B-C (or mastectomy estimated weight less than 550gm)
- Good subcutaneous layer (>1cm on pinch test measured in upper/medial quadrant)
- No previous breast surgery
- No previous breast irradiation
- Breast Ptosis 1-2 according to Renault's classification
- DCIS tumors
- T1 T2 pN0 breast tumor with known favourable biologic features
- Impossibility of immediate reconstruction with definitive implants due to inadequacy of mastectomy flaps (inadequate in quantity and/or quality)
- Positive sentinel node biopsy requiring complete axillary dissection
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Submuscular reconstruction Submuscolar reconstruction Submuscolar breast reconstruction Prepectoral reconstruction Prepectoral reconstruction Prepectoral breast reconstruction with Braxon dermal matrix
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Satisfaction assessed by the BREAST-Q 1 year The BREAST-Q survey is used to detect differences in patient satisfaction among the groups
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Immediate complications rate 1 month Compare post operative complications
Long term complications rate 24 months Compare long term post operative complications
Percentage of capsular contracture 1 year Compare overall aesthetic outcomes (percentage of capsular contracture) using standardized photographs assessed by independent blinded observers
Short term complications rate 6 months Compare short term post operative complications
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
European Institute of Oncology
🇮🇹Milan, Italy