A comparison of effects in continuing intravenous epinephrine and norepinephrine in an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with post-resuscitation shock : Cross-sectional study
- Conditions
- Any patient above 18 years old with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ROSCCardiac arrest, post cardiac arrest, Post resuscitation care, post cardiac arrest care, Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), Vasopressors, Epinephrine, Norepinephrine
- Registration Number
- TCTR20231118001
- Lead Sponsor
- Red cross institute Thailand
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 130
Any patient above 18 years old with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ROSC
patients under the age of 18
patients who have failed to achieve the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC)
Patients who have refractory shock require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
Patients who have been diagnosed with cardiac arrest due to acute myocardial infarction.
Patients who are absent used continuous intravenous treatment with epinephrine or norepinephrine.
Patients who receive vasoactive mediation before cardiac arrest
Patients who present with the apparent extra-cardiac cause of cardiac arrest (traumatic arrest, drowning, drug overdose, anaphylaxis)
patients who have transferred from outside Queen Savang Vadhana memorial hospital.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method the mortality rate of initial epinephrine or norepinephrine for hemodynamic stability at 1st hour after cardiac arrest 1 hour Hours
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To study the incidences of hemodynamic profiles while using vasopressor 1st hour hour