Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04458961
NCT04458961
Completed
Not Applicable

MIKROBE Management of Infected Knee Replacements-Obtaining Best Evidence A Feasibility Study for a Randomised Controlled Trial of One-stage or Two-stage Surgery for Prosthetic Knee Infection

Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust2 sites in 1 country3 target enrollmentNovember 17, 2020

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Sponsor
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
Enrollment
3
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Ease of recruitment of participants
Status
Completed
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Following a prosthetic knee joint infection, two types of operative approach can be undertaken to treat the infection: a one-stage or two-stage revision operation. Both approaches are widely used and are good at treating infection but we don't know which has the best long-term outcomes for patients. This trial aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to evaluate whether treating a prosthetic knee infection with one-stage revision surgery gives a better outcome than two-stage revision surgery in terms of patient function and pain, and cost-effectiveness.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 17, 2020
End Date
January 30, 2023
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults with prosthetic knee infection suitable for either one-stage or two-stage revision surgery
  • Intra-operatively, all cases must have adequate soft-tissue coverage post debridement to allow single or two stage revision surgery.
  • Case meets the International Consensus Meeting criteria for infection
  • Patients having had a Debridement, Anti-biotic and Implant Retained procedure previously or washout/biopsy only of an infected TKR are suitable

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unable or unwilling to undergo either treatment
  • Lacking capacity to consent to research
  • Refusal to consent to study for any reason
  • Re-revision of prosthetic knee infection if first revision was for infection
  • Presence of tuberculosis infection

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Ease of recruitment of participants

Time Frame: 20 months

Number of recruits compared to the number of potential participants.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Comparison of two sites(20 months)
  • Explaining the study(20 months)
  • Surgeon experience(20 months)
  • Protocol adherence(20 months)
  • Reasons for non-participation(20 months)
  • Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) outcome and completion rates(20 months)
  • Oxford Knee Score (OKS) outcome and completion rates(20 months)
  • EQ-5D-5L outcome and completion rates(20 months)
  • Patient experience(2 weeks after surgery)
  • Healthcare resource utilisation(20 months)

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials