MIKROBE Management of Infected Knee Replacements-Obtaining Best Evidence A Feasibility Study for a Randomised Controlled Trial of One-stage or Two-stage Surgery for Prosthetic Knee Infection
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Sponsor
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust
- Enrollment
- 3
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Ease of recruitment of participants
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Following a prosthetic knee joint infection, two types of operative approach can be undertaken to treat the infection: a one-stage or two-stage revision operation. Both approaches are widely used and are good at treating infection but we don't know which has the best long-term outcomes for patients. This trial aims to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial to evaluate whether treating a prosthetic knee infection with one-stage revision surgery gives a better outcome than two-stage revision surgery in terms of patient function and pain, and cost-effectiveness.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Adults with prosthetic knee infection suitable for either one-stage or two-stage revision surgery
- •Intra-operatively, all cases must have adequate soft-tissue coverage post debridement to allow single or two stage revision surgery.
- •Case meets the International Consensus Meeting criteria for infection
- •Patients having had a Debridement, Anti-biotic and Implant Retained procedure previously or washout/biopsy only of an infected TKR are suitable
Exclusion Criteria
- •Unable or unwilling to undergo either treatment
- •Lacking capacity to consent to research
- •Refusal to consent to study for any reason
- •Re-revision of prosthetic knee infection if first revision was for infection
- •Presence of tuberculosis infection
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Ease of recruitment of participants
Time Frame: 20 months
Number of recruits compared to the number of potential participants.
Secondary Outcomes
- Comparison of two sites(20 months)
- Explaining the study(20 months)
- Surgeon experience(20 months)
- Protocol adherence(20 months)
- Reasons for non-participation(20 months)
- Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) outcome and completion rates(20 months)
- Oxford Knee Score (OKS) outcome and completion rates(20 months)
- EQ-5D-5L outcome and completion rates(20 months)
- Patient experience(2 weeks after surgery)
- Healthcare resource utilisation(20 months)