MedPath

SNaP Wound Care System Versus Traditional NPWT Device for Treatment of Chronic Wounds

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Wounds
Ulcers
Registration Number
NCT00951080
Lead Sponsor
3M
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a novel negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) device called the SNaP device compared to a traditional NPWT device for the treatment of lower extremity diabetic and venous ulcer wounds.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized, two-arm, non-inferiority, multi-center study comparing negative pressure therapy wound healing outcomes between the SNaP Wound Care System and traditional NPWT systems.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
132
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subject has Venous Ulcer or Diabetic Ulcer with a surface area < 100 sq. cm and < 10 cm in widest diameter on lower extremity, but larger than 1 sq. cm
  • Subject has wound present for >30 days despite appropriate wound care
  • Subject has adequate blood perfusion (Defined as either transcutaneous oxygen measurements of the dorsum of the foot >30 mmHg or 0.7 < ABI <1.2)
  • Subject has wound in location amendable to creation of airtight seal around wound using NPWT dressings
  • Subject is able to understand and provide written consent
  • Subject able to understand and provide written consent
  • Male or non-pregnant female willing to have urine pregnancy test
Exclusion Criteria
  • Subject has Active Infection (Redness, Swelling, Pain, Purulent Exudate)
  • Subject has Untreated Osteomyelitis
  • Subject has Allergy to Wound Care Products used in the study
  • Subject has Malignancy, Burn, Collagen Vascular Disease, Sickle Cell, Vasculopathy, or Pyoderma Gangrenosum Origin of Wound
  • Subject has Active Charcot Arthropathy of the Foot
  • Subject has study wound location on toes or plantar surface of foot
  • Subject has uncontrolled hyperglycemia (HbA1C >12%)
  • Subject has end stage renal disease requiring dialysis
  • Subject is undergoing active chemotherapy treatment that inhibits wound healing
  • Subject has had previous treatment with NPWT device, growth factors, hyperbaric oxygen, or bioengineered tissue product within 30 days of enrollment
  • Subject has a >30% wound surface area reduction in size at 1 week after screening visit
  • Subject has any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the subject inappropriate to take part in this study
  • Subject is unwilling or unable to comply with protocol requirements
  • Subject is pregnant

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percent Change in Wound AreaBaseline and 16 weeks

The percent change in wound area as measured from Visitrak tracings (Value at 16 weeks minus value at baseline / value at baseline)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (17)

Hope Research Institute

🇺🇸

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Southern Arizona Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA)

🇺🇸

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Center for Clinical Research, Inc.

🇺🇸

Castro Valley, California, United States

Jay Mukker, DPM Inc.

🇺🇸

Fresno, California, United States

Palomar Pomerado Health Wound Care Center

🇺🇸

Poway, California, United States

O'Connor Wound Care Clinic

🇺🇸

San Jose, California, United States

John Muir Wound Care Center

🇺🇸

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Georgetown University Hospital

🇺🇸

Washington, District of Columbia, United States

Bethesda Health City Wound Care Center

🇺🇸

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Wound Care on Wheels, LLC

🇺🇸

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Scroll for more (7 remaining)
Hope Research Institute
🇺🇸Phoenix, Arizona, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.