Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02628613
NCT02628613
Completed
Phase 2

Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial and Biomarker Analysis of Paclitaxel Plus Epirubicin Versus Vinorelbine Plus Epirubicin as Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced HER2-Negative Breast Cancer With TEKT4 Variations

Fudan University1 site in 1 country91 target enrollmentDecember 2015

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Paclitaxel plus Epirubicin
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Sponsor
Fudan University
Enrollment
91
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
pathologic Complete Response (pCR)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficiency and safety between paclitaxel combined with epirubicin and vinorelbine combined with epirubicin when used in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced (IIb-IIIc) HER2-negative breast cancer with TEKT4 variations.

Detailed Description

Taxane-based chemotherapy is the cornerstone treating breast cancer, however remarkable percentage of breast cancer patients presents with primary or secondary taxane resistance. Currently no established biomarker has been reported clinically for predicting taxane sensitivity. Our previous study indicated that TEKT4 variation decreased the stability of intracellular microtubule, and TEKT4 variant cells behaves higher resistance to microtubule-stabilizing agents such as taxane, while enhanced sensibility to microtubule depolymerization agents such as vinorelbine. This study is intended to confirm that TEKT4 variation predicts the prognosis of taxane-based chemotherapy through the prospective clinical trials. This study intends to evaluate the efficiency and safety of two neoadjuvant therapies: paclitaxel combined with epirubicin and vinorelbine combined with epirubicin, in treating locally advanced (IIb-IIIc) HER2-negative breast cancer with TEKT4 variation. Primary endpoint of study: pathologic Complete Response (pCR). Secondary endpoints of the study: Objective response rate (CR+PR). Exploratory endpoint: Based on pretreatment tumor and matched blood samples, the correlation between biomarker and efficiency is explored. This open single center prospective randomized control study includes patients locally advanced (IIb-IIIc) HER2-negative patients with TEKT4 variation diagnosed with histopathology and Sanger sequencing. Patients randomized to Group A or Group B to receive respective neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Among which Group A: PE x 4 cycles (paclitaxel + epirubicin), paclitaxel: 80 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 8 and 15; epirubicin: 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and dosing interval is 21 days. Group B: NE x 4 cycles (vinorelbine + epirubicin), vinorelbine: 25 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 8 and 15; epirubicin: 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and dosing interval is 21 days. Patients of both groups were performed with diagnostic puncture before treatment and over half of treatment course in order to obtain information about dynamic change of Ki67 and other parameters; Surgery will be performed after 4 cycles of chemotherapy, followed with subsequent adjuvant therapy.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
December 2015
End Date
February 2019
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Female

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Zhimin Shao

MD

Fudan University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age: 18-70 years old
  • Expected survival \> 12 months
  • Baseline ECOG Performance Status rating 0-1
  • Naïve to chemotherapy or hormonal treatments
  • Radiologically confirmed and biopsy diagnosed invasive ductal carcinoma of breast and prepared to be treated surgically
  • Locally advance breast cancer of stage IIb-IIIc
  • HER-2 negative confirmed by immunohistochemistry, Ki-67≥20%
  • TEKT4 variation confirmed by DNA sequencing
  • No concurrent malignancy (except controlled cervical carcinoma in situ or basal cell carcinoma of skin)
  • Patients have measurable lesions (according to RECIST v1.1 criteria)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous regional or systemic treatment for breast cancer (include but not limited to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, other clinical trials)
  • Inflammatory breast cancer, bilateral breast cancer or breast cancer already with distant metastasis
  • Complicated with uncontrolled lung disease, severe infection, active peptic ulcer, blood clotting disorders, severe uncontrolled diabetes, connective tissue disorders or bone marrow suppression, and intolerance to neoadjuvant therapy or related treatment
  • Peripheral neuropathy \>1 degree caused by any reason
  • History of congestive heart failure, uncontrolled or symptomatic angina, arrhythmias or history of myocardial infarction, refractory hypertension (systolic blood pressure \> 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure \> 100 mmHg);
  • Breast cancer during lactation or pregnancy
  • Unwillingly to receive baseline puncture or neoadjuvant therapy
  • Mental illness or incompliance to treatment caused by other reasons
  • Known history of severe hypersusceptibility to any agents used in the treatment protocol
  • Patients received major surgery or suffered from severe trauma within 2 months of first administration

Arms & Interventions

Paclitaxel plus Epirubicin

Paclitaxel plus Epirubicin for 4 cycles, paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 8 and 15, epirubicin 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and dosing interval is 21 days.

Intervention: Paclitaxel plus Epirubicin

Vinorelbine plus Epirubicin

Vinorelbine plus Epirubicin for 4 cycles, vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 IV on day 1, 8 and 15, epirubicin 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1, and dosing interval is 21 days.

Intervention: Vinorelbine plus Epirubicin

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

pathologic Complete Response (pCR)

Time Frame: 3 years

pCR is defined as the absence of noninvasive tumor residuals in breast and axillary lymph nodes (ypT0/is ypN0) after neoadjuvant therapy.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Objective Response Rate (ORR)(3 years)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials