Effects of Prolonged Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation in Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Females
- Registration Number
- NCT07151963
- Brief Summary
Laboratory studies have shown that prolonged continuous theta burst stimulation (pcTBS) provides better pain relief than 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), with a shorter stimulation time, making it more practical for clinical use. Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy often causes neuropathic pain in cancer patients. The aims of this study are:
1. To compare the effects of pcTBS and 20 Hz rTMS on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy;
2. To compare the effects of pcTBS applied to the primary motor cortex versus the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on neuropathic pain as well as depression and anxiety.
- Detailed Description
\*\*Phase 1:\*\* We will recruit 20 breast cancer patients who have chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. They will be randomly divided into two groups.
* Group 1 will first receive pcTBS. After an 8-week break, they will then receive 20 Hz rTMS.
* Group 2 will receive the treatments in the opposite order.
Each treatment lasts for 5 consecutive days. Before and after each treatment, patients will be assessed using:
* A pain visual analog scale (to measure pain levels)
* A Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (The scale ranges from zero to 10, with zero indicating no pain at all and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain)
• \* A Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 (The scale ranges from 0-63, with a higher scores mean a worse outcome)
o \* Clinical pressure pain threshold tests (Higher PPT values indicate a higher tolerance to pressure pain (less sensitivity).
* Nerve conduction studies \*\*Phase 2:\*\* Another 20 breast cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy will be recruited and randomly divided into two groups.
* Group 1 will first receive pcTBS on the primary motor cortex. After an 8-week break, they will receive the same stimulation on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
* Group 2 will receive the treatments in the opposite order.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 40
-
a. breast cancer patients aged between 18- and 80-years-old with CIPN
b. history of receiving chemotherapy including taxane-based neurotoxic agents
c. with neuropathic pain, score≥3 in a 0-10 VAS pain scale.
d. with fair cognition and can cooperate to evaluate pain severity.
e. neither at end-stage cancer nor at the estimated survival time less than 6 months.
-
brain tumor or history of epilepsy
-
intracranial metallic devices, artificial cochleae, pacemakers, or any other metal device
-
recent myocardial ischemia or unstable angina
-
severe cognitive dysfunction or pregnancy
-
injuries or fractures in the part of neuropathic pain
-
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method visual analogue pain scale (VAS pain scale) baseline, pre-intervention and immediately after completion the intervention and at 4 weeks follow-up visual analogue pain scale (VAS) range from 0-100, with a higher score inducating more pain
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 baseline and after completion the intervention and at 4 weeks follow-up Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21 scale ranges from 0-63, with a higher scores mean a worse outcome.
pressure pain threshold test baseline and after completion the intervention and at 4 weeks follow-up o Higher pressure pain threshold values indicate a higher tolerance to pressure pain (less sensitivity).
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory baseline and after completion the intervention and at 4 weeks follow-up Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory ranges from zero to 10, with zero indicating no pain at all and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital
🇨🇳New Taipei City, Taiwan
Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital🇨🇳New Taipei City, Taiwan