MedPath

Spatial-Motor Stroke-Rehab Study

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Stroke
Spatial Neglect
Interventions
Device: Prism adaptation therapy (PAT) + Electrical stimulation (E-stim)
Device: Prism adaptation therapy (PAT) + Sham Stimulator
Other: Gait Training
Registration Number
NCT06053320
Lead Sponsor
Emory University
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to understand how prism adaptation training with and without electrical stimulation changes visuospatial behavior, motor system neurophysiology, and walking dysfunction.

Detailed Description

Spatial Neglect (SN) is defined as pathological asymmetric spatial behavior causing functional disability and occurs in greater than 50% of individuals with right hemisphere stroke. SN post-stroke is associated with increased fall risk, increased hospital length of stay, poorer rehabilitation outcomes, and severe long-term disability. Prism adaptation therapy (PAT) is an evidence-based treatment for SN after stroke, however, the effects of SN on gait are not well known. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation delivered via surface electrodes is a common therapeutic adjunct in stroke rehabilitation, including for SN and gait training. However, the additive therapeutic effects of combining electrical stimulation and PAT, as well as the effects of motor training on gait deficits associated with SN are poorly understood. Furthermore, although there is limited literature examining the effects of electrical stimulation on corticospinal tract output (CST), there is an inadequate understanding of the neural mechanisms of PAT and the combinatorial effects of PAT with electrical stimulation. To parse out the neural mechanisms of PAT and electrical stimulation on the visuospatial system, researchers will first examine the effects of PAT with or without electrical stimulation in neurologically unimpaired adults, researchers will then compare results to individuals with stroke with spatial neglect.

The primary objective is to study the effects of PAT on visuospatial behavior and motor cortical excitability in able-bodied individuals (young and older), and on spatial neglect, motor cortical neurophysiology, and walking function in individuals post-stroke.

The long-term goal of this project is to develop novel, effective, and personalized rehabilitation protocols targeting SN deficits and gait dysfunction to reduce disability in stroke survivors. The rationale of this project is to explore and generate data regarding future novel combinatorial motor-spatial retraining approaches that will enhance the rehabilitation approach of SN and gait performance in individuals post-stroke.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
35
Inclusion Criteria

Young Adults Able Bodied (YAB) Individuals

  • 18-30 years
  • Able-Bodied (healthy without any physical disability or neurological disorder)

Older Adults Able-Bodied Individuals (OAB)

  • 45-90 years
  • Able-Bodied (healthy without any physical disability or neurological disorder)

Individuals with right hemisphere stroke (40-90 years)

  • >3 months following stroke.
  • Presence of Aiming SN
  • Ability to walk >10m with or without assistive devices.
  • Unilateral left-sided hemiparesis with gross arm strength of ≤ grade 4/5 on the Medical Research Council Scale
  • Ability to follow 3-stage commands and provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria

Young Adults Able Bodied (YAB) Individuals and Older Adults Able-Bodied Individuals (OAB)

  • History or evidence of orthopedic or physical disability
  • History or evidence of neurological pathology
  • Pregnancy (female)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electronic system
  • Presence of skin conditions preventing electrical stimulation setup
  • Impaired sensation in the left upper limb.
  • Bruises or cuts at the stimulation electrode placement site
  • Concurrent enrollment in rehabilitation or another investigational study.
  • History or evidence of orthopedic or physical disability interfering with study procedures
  • History or evidence of neurological pathology or disorder
  • Severe uncontrolled medical problems (e.g., hypertension, cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, active cancer or renal disease, epilepsy) that may interfere with study procedures
  • Contraindications to TMS such as metal implants, medications that can increase cortical excitability, unexplained dizziness in the past 6 months

Individuals with right hemisphere stroke (40-90 years)

  • History of multiple strokes or brainstem strokes
  • Cerebellar disorders
  • Impaired sensation in the left upper limb.
  • History of other neurological disorders
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electronic system
  • Pregnancy (female)
  • Presence of skin condition
  • Bruises at the electrode placement site
  • Concurrent enrollment in rehabilitation or another investigational study
  • Severe uncontrolled medical problems (e.g., hypertension, cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, active cancer or renal disease, epilepsy) or other medical conditions that can interfere with study procedures
  • Contraindications to TMS such as metal implants in the brain, medications that will increase cortical excitability, etc.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Stroke with Spatial Neglect (SN) individualsPrism adaptation therapy (PAT) + Sham Stimulator40-90 years individuals with more than 3 months following right hemisphere stroke.
Young Able-Bodied individualsPrism adaptation therapy (PAT) + Electrical stimulation (E-stim)18-30 years old able-bodied individuals (healthy without any physical disability or neurological disorder).
Old Able-Bodied individualsPrism adaptation therapy (PAT) + Sham Stimulator45-90 years old able-bodied individuals (healthy without any physical disability or neurological disorder).
Stroke with Spatial Neglect (SN) individualsGait Training40-90 years individuals with more than 3 months following right hemisphere stroke.
Young Able-Bodied individualsPrism adaptation therapy (PAT) + Sham Stimulator18-30 years old able-bodied individuals (healthy without any physical disability or neurological disorder).
Old Able-Bodied individualsPrism adaptation therapy (PAT) + Electrical stimulation (E-stim)45-90 years old able-bodied individuals (healthy without any physical disability or neurological disorder).
Stroke with Spatial Neglect (SN) individualsPrism adaptation therapy (PAT) + Electrical stimulation (E-stim)40-90 years individuals with more than 3 months following right hemisphere stroke.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in intracortical excitability [paired pulse transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)]Pre-training and immediately after training session

Primary Motor Cortex (M1) and TMS from the hand muscles (first dorsal interossei) and the ankle (soleus) will be measured using Computer software (Biopac) that will record the muscle's responses to TMS pulses (MEPs) through electromyography (EMG) sensors attached to the skin of the legs and/or arms.

Change in visuospatial pointing behaviorPre-training and immediately after training session

Measured by the neuropsychological laboratory pointing behavior with the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process (KF-NAP) tool. Patients are asked to point with their eyes closed towards the center (proprioceptive pointing) and eyes open towards a target (visuo-proprioceptive pointing) on a standing calibrated board unaffected hand). The test is scored by measuring the deviation from 0 (midline). Pre-PAT and post-PAT measures are compared, there is no minimum or maximum score. A more negative score (Pre to Post) means improvement in visuospatial alignment (Improved left spatial neglect) in people post-stroke.

Change in corticospinal excitability (single pulse TMS)Pre-training and immediately after training session

Change in corticospinal excitability measured by the change from baseline in motor evoked potentials (MEP) amplitude responses from the hand muscles (first dorsal interossei) and the ankle (soleus) will be measured using Computer software (Biopac) that will record the muscle's responses to TMS pulses (MEPs) through electromyography (EMG) sensors attached to the skin of the legs and/or arms.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS)Pre-training and immediately after training session

Measured by a validated assessment tool that is sensitive to SN and its functional sequela; CBS motor items have been validated to identify Aiming SN. The CBS uses a 4-point rating scale to indicate the severity of neglect for each item:

0 = no neglect

1. = mild neglect (patient always explores the right hemispace first and slowly or hesitantly explores the left side)

2. = moderate neglect (patient demonstrates constant and clear left-sided omissions or collisions)

3. = severe neglect (patient is only able to explore the right hemispace)

This results in a total score of 30. Reported arbitrary ratings of neglect severity according to total scores:

0 = No behavioral neglect 1-10 = Mild behavioral neglect 11-20 = Moderate behavioral neglect 21-30 = Severe behavioral neglect

Change in weight-bearing asymmetryPre-training and immediately after training session

This outcome will be measured only in participants who have had a stroke. Force platform data obtained from a dual-belt instrumented treadmill during 3-d motion capture will be used to calculate inter-limb asymmetry in vertical ground reaction forces in standing and during the stance phase of gait.

Change in computerized line bisection taskPre-training and immediately after training session

Participants are asked to perform the conventional 24cm line bisection task on a 14-inch screen computer screen, placed 55cm from a seated position, with the unaffected hand using a mouse. There are 64 lines, half of which are in normal condition and half in reversed condition. The test is scored by measuring the deviation of the bisection from the true center of the line. A deviation negative of zero (0) is indicative of spatial neglect; Pre-PAT and post-PAT measures are compared, and a negative score reflects a shift to the left visual space- the effect of PAT

Change in spatial neglect deficitsPre-training and immediately after training session

Measured by the clinical tests Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT). The BIT Conventional (BITC) subtest consists of 6 items: line crossing, letter cancelation, star cancellation, figure and shape copying, line bisection, and representational drawing. The Cut-offs score for the BITC is 129 out of 146. Higher scores are indicative of more severe visual impairment.

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Emory Rehabilitation Hospital

🇺🇸

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Emory University Hospital (EUH)

🇺🇸

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Executive Park

🇺🇸

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath