Evaluating the Role of Neuroinflammation in Low Back Pain
- Conditions
- Back AchePain, ChronicBack Pain Lower Back ChronicBack Pain With RadiationBack Pain Without RadiationLow Back Pain
- Interventions
- Other: Placebo CapsuleDiagnostic Test: Magnetic Resonance-Positron Emission Tomography Imaging
- Registration Number
- NCT03106740
- Lead Sponsor
- Marco Loggia
- Brief Summary
In this research, the study team will use brain imaging to evaluate the presence of neuroinflammation in the brains and spinal cords of patients with low back pain. The efficacy of minocycline use for low back pain treatment will also be evaluated by observing whether short-term minocycline administration will reduce neuroinflammation and low back pain symptoms.
- Detailed Description
The goal of this research study is to evaluate whether the central nervous systems of those with low back pain are different from those of healthy, pain-free individuals. Specifically, the researchers will test whether "glial cells" (the immune cells of the brain and spinal cord) are more active in patients with low back pain than in healthy volunteers. The investigators' previous study showed that patients with chronic low back pain demonstrated elevations in brain levels of the 18kDa translocator protein (TSPO), a marker of glial activation.
To test this hypothesis, the study team will image the brains and spinal cords of patients suffering from low back pain using integrated magnetic resonance- positron emission tomography (MR-PET), and a radiotracer called \[11C\]PBR28, which tracks levels of glial activation.
The efficacy of minocycline as a treatment for chronic low back pain will also be evaluated. A recent study demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in pain in those with lumbar radiculopathy after treatment with minocycline, leading the investigators of this study to believe that minocycline may have potential efficacy in treating other back pain populations.
The study team will observe whether a short course of minocycline hydrochloride may reduce glial activation along with self-reported low back pain symptoms. To this end, patients will be evaluated clinically and/or re-scanned after completing a 2-week trial of minocycline or placebo (a sugar pill).
This study will be enrolling individuals who have been suffering from sub-acute (short-term) and chronic low back pain.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- the ability to give written informed consent
- fluency in English
- on a stable pain treatment
- Chronic or sub-acute low back pain
- no interventional pain procedures during drug trial
- contraindications to MRI and PET scanning (including presence of a cardiac pacemaker or pacemaker wires, metallic particles in the body, vascular clips in the head or previous neurosurgery, prosthetic heart valves, claustrophobia)
- pregnancy or breast feeding
- any use of recreational drugs in the past 6 months
- allergy to minocycline or other tetracyclines, or taking medications known to interact with minocycline
- any other contraindications to minocycline administration
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Minocycline Arm Minocycline Hydrochloride 100mg Capsule Evaluation with Magnetic Resonance-Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and/or behavioral pain assessment before and after a 2-week trial of Minocycline Hydrochloride, 100mg capsule Placebo Arm Placebo Capsule Evaluation with Magnetic Resonance-Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and/or behavioral pain assessment before and after 2 weeks of treatment with a placebo capsule. Minocycline Arm Magnetic Resonance-Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Evaluation with Magnetic Resonance-Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and/or behavioral pain assessment before and after a 2-week trial of Minocycline Hydrochloride, 100mg capsule Placebo Arm Magnetic Resonance-Positron Emission Tomography Imaging Evaluation with Magnetic Resonance-Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and/or behavioral pain assessment before and after 2 weeks of treatment with a placebo capsule.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in Thalamic Standardized Uptake Value Ratio (SUVR) The outcome measure was assessed in two time points, before and after a two-week treatment period. The ratio of the standardized uptake value (SUV; mean radioactivity divided by the injected dose by weight) of the whole thalamus divided by the SUV of the whole brain (i.e., standardized uptake value ratio or SUVR) derived from the translocator protein positron emission tomography (TSPO-PET) signal. Higher SUVR might be indicative of higher neuroinflammation.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes in Spinal PET Signal 2 weeks The investigators will test for the presence of a significant treatment\*time interaction in the spinal \[11C\]PBR28 signal.
Daily Pain Ratings (as Measured by the Modified Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Severity Subscale) 2 weeks The investigators will test for the presence of a significant treatment\*time interaction in pain outcomes using the severity subscale of the Brief Pain Intensity, short form (range 0-10)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
🇺🇸Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States