Comparison of Dexmedetomidine by two different routes with bupivacaine in ultrasound guided block for upper limb surgeries.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: null- Patients undergoing Elective Surgeries in Supraclavicular Block
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2018/08/015389
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr RPGMC Kangra at Tanda
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. ASA class I-II
2. BMI 18.5-29.9
3. Undergoing surgeries around midarm, elbow, forearm and hand
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patientâ??s refusal for block
2. History of cardiac, renal or hepatic disease, CNS disorders,neuropathy
3. Patients having bleeding disorders
4. Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics
5. Local infection at the site where needle for block is to be inserted
6. Patients noted to have dysrhythmias on the electrocardiogram (ECG)
7. Allergic to study drugs
8. Patients in whom the block effect will be partial and will require supplementary anesthesia
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To study and compare the onset and duration of sensory and motor blockade with two different routes of dexmedetomidine viz. perineural and intramuscular as an adjuvant to 0.5% bupivacaine in ultrasound guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block in patients scheduled for upper limb orthopaedic surgeriesTimepoint: 24 hours
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method â?¢To study and compare the hemodynamic stability of two different routes of dexmedetomidine.Timepoint: 24 HOURS;To observe for side effects of dexmedetomidine in two different routes, if any.Timepoint: 24 HOURS;To study and compare sedation with different routes of dexmedetomidineTimepoint: 24 HOURS