MedPath

Informing Decisions in Chronic Critical Illness: A Randomized Control Trial (RCT)

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Chronic Critical Illness
Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation
Interventions
Behavioral: Supportive Information Team Group
Registration Number
NCT01230099
Lead Sponsor
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to test a communication intervention to support family decision-making for patients with chronic critical illness.

Detailed Description

Increasing use of intensive care therapies by an aging population has created a new medical syndrome - "chronic critical illness" - encompassing multi-system derangements, recurrent complications, and protracted/permanent dependence on mechanical ventilation and other life-supports. Numbering \>100,000 at any point in time, the chronically critically ill are a growing population of older adults and a serious national health problem. Annual expenditures for these patients are estimated at $24 billion, mostly for patients ≥ 65 years old. Yet 6-month mortality rates exceed those for most malignancies, impairments are severe among survivors, and return to the community is rare. Descriptive research has identified domains of information that are important for decision-making by patients/families about continuation of treatment in the chronic phase of critical illness, but has also revealed that decisions are often made without this information or patient goals of care as a context. In acute critical illness, scheduled, structured meetings and printed informational aids are effective for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) families, but no study has tested an intervention to inform and support decision-making about chronic critical illness. This study is a randomized, controlled, multi-center clinical trial of such an intervention. Specific Aims are: (1) To evaluate the impact on family- and patient-focused outcomes of a proactive program of protocolized, interdisciplinary, informational support meetings led by a palliative care physician, plus a printed informational aid, for families of chronically critically ill patients; and (2) To evaluate the impact of this intervention on utilization of critical care resources for the chronically critically ill. We hypothesize that as compared to usual care plus the printed aid, this intervention will effectively inform decision-making, improve family well-being, promote discussion of preferences for patient goals of care, and optimize critical care resource utilization, without increasing patient mortality.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
622
Inclusion Criteria
  • Mechanically ventilated ≥ 7 days
  • Mechanically ventilated without > 96 hour interruption
  • Age ≥ 21 years
  • ICU MD does not expect patient will die within 72 hours
  • ICU MD does not expect patient will be liberated from the ventilator within 72 hours.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous admission to study ICU this hospitalization Mechanically ventilated at outside hospital for > 7 days before transfer
  • Chronic Neuromuscular (NM) Disease
  • Trauma
  • Burn
  • Previous palliative care consultation in this hospitalization
  • No family or other surrogate decision-maker
  • Family not available
  • Surrogate lacks English proficiency
  • Physician refused permission for research staff to approach the family

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Supportive Information Team GroupSupportive Information Team GroupProtocolized information and support meetings led by palliative care clinicians
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleDay 90
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Hospital Length of StayAverage of 60 days

Days since randomization

MortalityDay 90
Discussion of Preferences for Patients Goals of CareDay 90

Subscale of Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research Toolkit

Hospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleDay 18-20
Limitation of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) TherapyAverage of 60 days

Percent of patients with mechanical ventilation, renal replacement, vasopressors, or artificial nutrition withheld or withdrawn

Quality of CommunicationDay 18-20

Curtis Measure

Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) SurveyDay 90
Modified Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research (CHCR) ToolDay 90
Impact of Events Scale-RevisedDay 90
Physician-Surrogate Discordance Scoreday 18-20

Trial Locations

Locations (4)

University of North Carolina School of Medicine

🇺🇸

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Durham Regional Medical Center

🇺🇸

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Duke University School of Medicine

🇺🇸

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath