MedPath

CP-690,550 Thorough QTc Study

Phase 1
Completed
Conditions
Healthy
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01743677
Lead Sponsor
Pfizer
Brief Summary

ICH E14 recommends that a thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study should be performed to determine whether intensive monitoring of QT interval in target patient populations is required during later stages of development. The current study is designed to ascertain whether CP-690,550 is associated with QTc prolongation.

Detailed Description

The current study is designed to ascertain whether CP-690,550 is associated with QTc prolongation

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Healthy male and/or female subjects between ages of 18 and 55 years, inclusive.
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) of approximately 18 to 30 kg/m2; and a total body weight >50 kg (110 lbs).
Exclusion Criteria
  • Use of tobacco- or nicotine-containing products in excess of equivalent of 5 cigarettes per day.
  • 12-lead ECG demonstrating QTc >450 msec or other clinically significant abnormalities at Screening.
  • History of risk factors for QT prolongation or torsades de pointes.
  • Pregnant or nursing women; women of childbearing potential unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of nonhormonal contraception from at least 14 days prior to first dose until completion of follow-up.
  • Use of prescription or nonprescription drugs, vitamins and dietary supplements within 7 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to first dose of trial medication.
  • Any clinically significant infections within past 3 months or evidence of infection in past 7 days.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
CP-690,550 100 mgCP-690,550-
PlaceboPlacebo-
Moxifloxacin hydrochlorideMoxifloxacin-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 1 Hour Post-Dose1 hour post-dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 16 Hours Post-Dose16 hours post-dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 0.25 Hour Post-Dose0.25 hour post-dose

Triplicate 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The time corresponding to the beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as Least Squares (LS) mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 24 Hours Post-Dose24 hours post-dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 12 Hours Post-Dose12 hours post-dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 0.5 Hour Post-Dose0.5 hour post-dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 2 Hours Post-Dose2 hours post-dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 4 Hours Post-Dose4 hours post-dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo at 8 Hours Post-Dose8 hours post-dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcB Intervals Between CP-690,550 Compared to Placebo0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours post-dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Bazett's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (CP-690,550 minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] for CP-690,5500 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

AUC (0 - ∞)= Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞).

Mean Time-Matched Difference in QTcF Intervals Between Moxifloxacin Compared to Placebo2 hours post-dose

Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and average was calculated. The QT interval was adjusted for RR interval using the QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR). Data is reported as LS mean difference (moxifloxacin minus Placebo, baseline-adjusted).

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for CP-690,5500 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast).

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CP-690,5500 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) for CP-690,5500 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose
Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Extrapolated Infinite Time [AUC (0 - ∞)] of CP-690,550 by Cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) Genotype0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

AUC (0 - ∞)= Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) from time zero (pre-dose) to extrapolated infinite time (0 - ∞). It is obtained from AUC (0 - t) plus AUC (t - ∞). Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. AUC (0 - ∞) categorized by genotype into poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.

Area Under the Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from zero to the last measured concentration (AUClast). Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. AUClast categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. Tmax categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.

Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by one half. Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. t1/2 categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.

Plasma Decay Half-Life (t1/2) of CP-690,5500 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Plasma decay half-life is the time measured for the plasma concentration of drug to decrease by one half.

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of CP-690,550 by CYP2C19 Genotype0 (pre-dose), and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose

Variation in CYP2C19 gene affected the pharmacokinetics of CP-690,550. Cmax categorized by genotype as poor metabolizer, extensive metabolizer and ultra extensive metabolizer of CYP2C19.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Pfizer Clinical Research Unit

🇸🇬

Singapore, Singapore

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath