Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07205679
NCT07205679
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable

Cardiovascular Performance and Exercise Response in Patients With Persistent or Permanent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure Pre and Post Cardioversion or Pace and Ablate

Habib Khan0 sites40 target enrollmentStarted: October 1, 2025Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Habib Khan
Enrollment
40
Primary Endpoint
Exercise duration

Overview

Brief Summary

Heart Failure (HF) and Atrial Fibrillation (AF) are two conditions that commonly occur together. Clinical guidelines consider a resting heart rate of 100-110 beats per minute (bpm) acceptable for patients with HF and AF while 72 bpm is considered the average in healthy populations. A higher resting heart rate indicates that the heart is working harder to meet bodily demands, and though it may be considered safe for patients with HF and AF to have a heart rate of 110 bpm, the investigators believe it is having a significant negative impact on patient quality of life and their ability to exercise. The current study will test exercise ability using a treadmill test before and after either a cardioversion, where the patient's heartbeat is reset using electric shocks, or a pace and ablate method, where the patient receives a pacemaker to regulate their heart rhythm and an ablation (intentional damaging) of the node that coordinates the beats within the heart. This will allow investigators to compare how the heart responds to exercise when the patient is on rate-control and anticoagulation medication therapy (before cardioversion or pace and ablate) and after the procedures. During exercise, the investigators will do a blood test that lets investigators know how efficiently the heart is working and record any symptoms experienced. The investigators will also collect information about the patient's quality of life. Using this information, the investigators hope to better understand whether the current standard of a resting heart rate of 100-110 bpm is ideal for patient quality of life.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Persistent or Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
  • HF - NYHA class II-IVA despite guideline-direct medical therapy
  • Rate controlled
  • Able to perform stress test
  • Scheduled for clinical P\&A OR cardioversion

Exclusion Criteria

  • Creatinine \>180 μmol/L or eGFR \<30 mL/min/1.73 m2
  • Significant valvular heart disease: Moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis, aortic regurgitation, aortic stenosis
  • Patients who have had a TAVI, valvular surgery, or CABG within 3 months of enrolment
  • Right ventricular systolic pressure \>50mmHg
  • Existing pacemaker
  • In sinus rhythm
  • Predictable vasovagal syncope to pain and sight of blood

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Exercise duration

Time Frame: 1 month

Peak oxygen update

Time Frame: 1 month

Peak oxygen uptake achieved during a symptom-limited incremental exercise test to task failure.

B-type Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) Test

Time Frame: 1 month

Secondary Outcomes

  • EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L)(1 month)
  • Rate of Perceived exertion change during exercise(1 month)
  • Change in maximal HR during exercise(1 month)
  • V̇O2peak change(1 month)
  • Change in lactate threshold(1 month)
  • Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire(1 month)

Investigators

Sponsor
Habib Khan
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Habib Khan

MBBS, PhD

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

Similar Trials