Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01927978
NCT01927978UnknownNot Applicable

Using "PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST)" in Evaluating Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherpy for Esophageal Cancer

National Taiwan University Hospital1 site in 1 country60 target enrollmentStarted: October 2012Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
60
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET in the initial staging, therapy planning, and therapeutic response monitoring for esophageal cancer patients.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study is aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET in the initial staging, therapy planning, and therapeutic response monitoring for esophageal cancer patients.

Purpose:

  1. The incremental staging information by using 18F-FDG PET
  2. The impact of the PET results on the patients' subsequent therapy planning
  3. To compare treatment response using RECIST criteria and FDG PET results.

Detailed Description

Background: Esophageal cancer is one of the leading malignancies in Taiwan. Accuracy tumor staging can direct to appropriate therapy planning and provide prognostic implications. Positron emission tomography (PET) with [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) has been shown to have better N staging and prognostic stratification abilities than conventional imaging modalities, such as endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and CT.

Purpose: This study is aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET in the initial staging, therapy planning, and therapeutic response monitoring for esophageal cancer patients.

Method: Patients with pathological proven esophageal cancer, age 20-90 year-old, will be included in this study. Each patient will receive a baseline PET study. For those patients who received pre-operative CCRT, another PET will be performed 1-4 weeks after completion of CCRT.

Primary outcome: 1. The incremental staging information by using 18F-FDG PET 2. The impact of the PET results on the patients' subsequent therapy planning 3. To compare treatment response using RECIST criteria and FDG PET results.

Secondary outcome: To correlate the PET response rate and the patients' disease free survival and overall survival.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Case Only
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20 Years to 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Age:20-90 years old
  • •Histological proved esophageal cancer
  • •ECOG performance status 0-2
  • •written informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria

  • •prior chemotherapy or treatment for other systemic anti-cancer agent(s)
  • •pregnant or intend to be pregnant
  • •other malignancies known
  • •other concurrent cancer treatment

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET in the initial staging, therapy planning, and therapeutic response monitoring for esophageal cancer patients.

Time Frame: 2 hours

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials