A Phase III, Randomized, Controlled, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity, Safety, and Tolerability of an Adjuvanted A(H1N1) Vaccine Versus Non-Adjuvanted Vaccines Against Novel H1N1 Virus in Patients With Invasive Solid Tumors
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- H1N1 Influenza Virus
- Sponsor
- Chiltern Pesquisa Clinica Ltda
- Enrollment
- 59
- Locations
- 3
- Primary Endpoint
- The primary objective of this study is to determine the optimal influenza vaccination strategy in patients with invasive solid tumors
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 13 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
This is a phase III, randomized, controlled, open label study with two vaccine regimens. The study will assess the relative safety and immunogenicity of vaccine regimens comparing adjuvanted versus non-adjuvanted formulations of A(H1N1) inactivated influenza virus vaccine in subjects with Solid Invasive Tumors and to compare safety and immunogenicity data with a contemporaneously enrolled control group of age-comparable, healthy subjects.
Because certain individuals may be hypo-responsive to influenza vaccination, additional studies with high-risk groups are warranted in order to determine the optimal vaccine formulation and dosing schedule for prevention of novel H1N1 virus infection.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •For Invasive Solid Tumor Subjects:
- •Subjects between 2 and 70 years of age (inclusive)
- •Any sex or ethnicity
- •Confirmed diagnosis of Invasive Solid Tumor or hematological malignancies in complete remission for at least 3 months and not more than 18 months after the last neo-adjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy cycle according to investigators assessment and the subjects medical records
- •Previous use of neo-adjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment on an invasive solid tumor
- •Life expectancy of at least 12 months
- •Karnofsky Performance Scale \> 40%
- •Childbearing potential women must be willing to use an acceptable contraceptive method. Acceptable contraceptive methods are defined as one or more of the following:
- •Hormone contraceptive (such as oral, injectable, transdermal patch, subcutaneous implant, cervical ring)
- •Barrier (condom with spermicide or diaphragm with spermicide) at each intercourse and during the whole intercourse
Exclusion Criteria
- •For Invasive Solid Tumor Subjects:
- •Previous laboratory confirmed diagnosis of an infection by the novel H1N1 virus
- •Administration of other vaccine against the novel H1N1 virus within 3 months prior to inclusion in the study
- •Any recent vaccine given within the last 21 days (inclusive)
- •History of allergic reaction to an influenza vaccine in the past, or a current or previous occurrence of allergy to egg or egg protein, kanamycin, and neomycin sulfate
- •Acute febrile disease (vaccination may be delayed up to 3 days after the resolution of the symptoms)
- •Presence of other diseases, not related to cancer with confirmed immunosuppression
- •Chemotherapy, biologic therapy or radiation within 3 months prior to inclusion in the study
- •History of chronic hepatic or renal disease
- •History of cognitive disorders
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
The primary objective of this study is to determine the optimal influenza vaccination strategy in patients with invasive solid tumors
Time Frame: 3 months
Secondary Outcomes
- Assess whether the adjuvanted vaccine offers a meaningful benefit in relation to the non-adjuvanted vaccine in this at-risk population(3 months)
- Assess whether two doses of either study vaccine will provide meaningful benefit in comparison to one dose(3 months)
- Assess the persistence of antibody levels in the two vaccine groups(3 months)
- Gain further insight into the safety of the adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted H1N1 vaccines in this high-risk patient population(3 months)