MedPath

Biological & Fonctional Signatures for Muscle Failures, Aged People & Personalized Physical Activity

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Elderly
Interventions
Procedure: blood sample
Other: physical assessement
Behavioral: psychometric assessment
Registration Number
NCT05343286
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
Brief Summary

Physical activity is one of the most effective therapeutic interventions for frailty, sarcopenia or dynapenia. The benefits of physical activity processes are already widely documented. Typically, researchers want to understand the average response to an intervention to determine its overall effectiveness. However, sports trainers have understood it for a long time, the response of an athlete or a patient to training is very variable and the standard deviations present in all the scientific studies on the subject confirm it. There is therefore inter-individual variation in the response to exercise, with some subjects showing much greater improvements than others. Thus, one can wonder if this "non-response" following training is specific to the training modality. The effects of physical exercise on the body depend mainly on its type, intensity and duration. Thus, from a practical point of view, the most important perspective is the prediction and, ultimately, the individual optimization of management through physical activity.

Detailed Description

Main objective: To determine the effects of personalized physical activity management on the biological signatures of muscle failure.

Secondary objectives:

* Propose a support system through adapted and individualized physical activity, based on physical, biological and psycho-social indicators

* Identify the biological signatures (metabolomics, epigenetic) of muscle failure in the elderly.

Phenotype responders and non-responders in training

900 seniors (300 per group) APAP group: adapted and personalized physical activity APA group: adapted physical activity Control group: no physical activity

Total duration of the study 5 years, duration of participation for a patient 3 months; inclusion period: 57 months

Improvement of muscle failure in its broad definition (Strength, power, speed and lean mass)

) General data: description of characteristics with frequencies and percentage for categorical variables and with mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables.

ii) Analysis of the primary endpoint: Machine Learning (or supervised classification) and signaling pathway prediction approaches for statistical analysis and data interpretation.

iii) Analysis of secondary judgment criteria: approaches in Machine Learning (or supervised classification) and signaling pathway prediction for statistical analysis and interpretation of data with comparison of quantitative variables by Pearson correlation and categorical variables by t or chi 2 test depending on the case.

Adapt and individualize physical activity support for healthy or frail elderly people

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
900
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age greater than or equal to 60 years
  • Affiliated patient or beneficiary of a social security scheme
  • Patient having signed a prior informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Neurocognitive disorder preventing the expression of informed consent
  • Patients protected by law under guardianship or curatorship, or who cannot participate in a clinical study under Article L. 1121-16 of the French Public Health Code
  • Presence of a physical or cognitive pathology preventing the performance of the adapted physical activity protocol over 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
APAP group: adapted and personalized physical activityblood sample12 weeks of adapted and personalized physical activity
Control group: no physical activityphysical assessementno physical activity
Control group: no physical activityblood sampleno physical activity
APA group: adapted physical activitypsychometric assessment12 weeks of generic physical activity
APA group: adapted physical activityblood sample12 weeks of generic physical activity
APA group: adapted physical activityphysical assessement12 weeks of generic physical activity
Control group: no physical activitypsychometric assessmentno physical activity
APAP group: adapted and personalized physical activityphysical assessement12 weeks of adapted and personalized physical activity
APAP group: adapted and personalized physical activitypsychometric assessment12 weeks of adapted and personalized physical activity
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
muscle powerbefore and after 12 week of physical activity program

muscle power (Watt/Kg) assessed with the isokinetic ergometer.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Sit-to-stand Testbefore and after 12 week of physical activity program

number of movement

Quantified Gait Analysis (QAM)before and after 12 week of physical activity program

Gait velocity in m.s-1

Physical self-perceptionbefore and after 12 week of physical activity program

Score on the French version of the Physical Self-Perception Profile, 0-6, higher score means better outcome

Change in the amino acid composition (metabolomic signature) after 3 month of physical activitybetween Day 0 and Month 3

Change in the amino acid composition (metabolomic signature) after 3 month of physical activity for the APA and APAP groups compared to the no physical activity group

Different metabolomic signature (The amino acid composition) between the groups (APA, APAP, no physical activity)at day 0

Change in the amino acid composition (metabolomic signature) at Day 0 between the groups

ICOPE Monitor Assessmentbefore and after 12 week of physical activity program

Score of frailty. (Implementation of the Integrated Care of Older People, ICOPmonitor, 8 item, higher score means worse outcome)

Cognitive testsbefore and after 12 week of physical activity program

Score Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE, 0-30, higher score mean worse outcome)

The long questionnaire of personality traitsbefore and after 12 week of physical activity program

Score of Big Five Inventory, 0-44, higher score means worse outcome

Perceived health (Score of the scale)before and after 12 week of physical activity program

Score of the scale, 0-6, higher score means better outcome

Subjective agebefore and after 12 week of physical activity program

Subjective age in years

Motivation scale for physical activity for health purposesbefore and after 12 week of physical activity program

Score on the Motivation Scale for Physical Activity in a Health Context,0-30, higher score means better outcome

Aging Stereotypes and Exercise Scalebefore and after 12 week of physical activity program

Score on the French Aging Stereotypes and Exercise Scale (ASES), 0-12, higher score means better outcome

Age group identification (Years)before and after 12 week of physical activity program

Age group identification in years

Bone densitometer measurement of body compositionbefore and after 12 week of physical activity program

% of lean mass

Attitudes towards agingbefore and after 12 week of physical activity program

Score on the French version of the Attitudes Toward Own Aging scales, 0-7, higher score means better outcome

Improvement of muscle forcebefore and after 12 week of physical activity program

Improvement of muscle force (N/Kg) assessed with the isokinetic ergometer.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

CHU de Nice

🇫🇷

Nice, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath