Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2019/05/018985
CTRI/2019/05/018985
Completed
Phase 4

Anesthetic efficacy of supplemental buccal infiltration with 4% Articaine, after a failed inferior alveolar nerve block or Gow Gates nerve block with 2% Lignocaine in mandibular molars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis-A Randomized Double blind trial

Kanaga priyaa V0 sites114 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
Kanaga priyaa V
Enrollment
114
Status
Completed
Last Updated
4 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
August 16, 2019
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor
Kanaga priyaa V

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Systemically healthy patients
  • •patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars
  • •Absence of any periapical radiolucency on radiograph except for a widening of periodontal ligament
  • •A vital pulp at access cavity preparation
  • •Ability to understand the use of pain scales

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Allergy to local anesthetics, pregnancy, the use of any medications such as sedatives,antianxiety,antidepressants or analgesics that might influence pain assessment, the presence of active pathosis in the area of injection, the inability to give written informed consent

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Recruiting
Phase 1
Comprison of anesthetic efficacy of Buccal Infilteration versus Inferior Alveolar Nerve block for Pulpotomy in Mandibular Second Primary Molars in sedated patientsanesthetic efficacy.
IRCT20190313043046N2Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences30
Completed
Not Applicable
Effect of retromolar pad infiltration on mandibular first molars
IRCT20161031030608N2Islamic Azad University50
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Evaluation of the adequacy of anesthesia achieved by 4% Articaine buccal infiltration during extraction of lower premolars for orthodontic purpose
CTRI/2022/08/044724Dasmesh Institute Of Research and Dental Sciences Faridkot
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Is combination of buccal plus palatal injection better than the buccal alone during the endodontic treatment of maxillary molars using 2% lidocaine and 4articaine with same adrenaline concentration- A clinical study
CTRI/2021/05/033659Department of Oral Health Science Centre
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Anesthetic Efficacy of Infiltration of ArticaineAnesthetic efficacy for extraction of mandibular primary molars.
IRCT20220129053868N1Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences100