A study comparingdifferent methods in the treatment of gum recessio
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/03/064180
- Lead Sponsor
- Rashika M
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Presence of Gingival Recession (Miller’s Class I & II)
Presence of detectable CEJ.
Not using tobacco in any form.
Systemically healthy subjects with no contraindication to periodontal surgery.
Able to achieve good oral hygiene.
Subjects who gave written consent.
Subjects who were available for follow up.
Presence of severe tooth malposition, rotation or clinically significant supraeruption.
Cervical or root caries, cervical abrasion, prosthetic crown and restorations involving cemento-enamel junction.
Pregnant and lactating mothers.
Hypersensitivity or allergy to the products used.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Recession/ Root coverageTimepoint: 1.At baseline, 3 months, 6 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.Keratinized Gingival Width <br/ ><br>2.Gingival Thickness <br/ ><br>3.Relative Attachment Level <br/ ><br>4.Probing Depth <br/ ><br>5.Bone RegenerationTimepoint: 1.At baseline, 3 months and 6months 2.At baseline, 3 months and 6months <br/ ><br>3.At baseline, 3 months and 6months <br/ ><br>4.At baseline, 3 months and 6months <br/ ><br>5.At baseline and 6months