Medical Students' Acceptance and Learning Efficacy With Physical and Virtual Standardized Patients

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Education, Medical
• Interventions: Other: With physical standardized patients; Other: With virtual standardized patients

• Registration Number: NCT06030466
• Lead Sponsor: National Taiwan University Hospital

Brief Summary

This study will focus on exploring the experiential differences between virtual standardized patients and physical standardized patients, gathering feedback through questionnaires and brief interviews. Standardized patients have been widely used in medical education and physician licensing exams in Taiwan for over 15 years. With the rise of technology-enhanced medical education, it is necessary to reexamine the professional attributes and identification of standardized patients and explore the implementation of virtual standardized patient systems. The research aims to reshape the professional identity of standardized patients, identify necessary attributes and competencies, and establish a virtual standardized patient system to assess medical students' acceptance and learning outcomes.

Detailed Description

This research project aims to investigate the differences in acceptance and learning efficacy between physical standardized patients and virtual standardized patients among medical students. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the physical standardized patient group or the virtual standardized patient group. They will experience scenarios with real standardized patients or screen-based virtual standardized patients, engaging in activities such as taking medical histories and explaining conditions. The study will collect questionnaire feedback on learning efficacy and acceptance.

The primary research questions include: Are there differences in medical students' perceptions of teaching scenarios involving virtual standardized patients versus physical standardized patients? Are there differences in medical students' self-efficacy growth after practicing teaching scenarios with virtual standardized patients versus real standardized patients? Secondary research questions include: What professional attributes and competencies should standardized patients possess? Does technological literacy influence medical students' acceptance of virtual standardized patients? How do virtual and physical standardized patient scenarios differ in terms of perceptions by standardized patients and learners?

This study will focus on exploring the experiential differences between virtual standardized patients and physical standardized patients, gathering feedback through questionnaires and brief interviews. Standardized patients have been widely used in medical education and physician licensing exams in Taiwan for over 15 years. With the rise of technology-enhanced medical education, it is necessary to reexamine the professional attributes and identification of standardized patients and explore the implementation of virtual standardized patient systems. The research aims to reshape the professional identity of standardized patients, identify necessary attributes and competencies, and establish a virtual standardized patient system to assess medical students' acceptance and learning outcomes.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2023-08-24
• Study First Submitted QC: 2023-09-01
• Study First Posted: 2023-09-11
• Status Verified: 2024-10
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-10-24
• Last Update Posted: 2024-10-28
• Study Start: 2024-12
• Primary Completion: 2025-04
• Study Completion: 2025-05

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 60

Inclusion Criteria

1. Medical students studying at the National Taiwan University School of Medicine
2. Able to understand the research case and sign the written consent form

Exclusion Criteria

1. Has used relevant virtual standardized patient software in the past (past exposure)
2. Unable to adapt to technological applications or successfully use this virtual standardized patient system (unable to cooperate with research)

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: CROSSOVER

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
With physical standardized patients	With physical standardized patients	Medical students practice consultation with physical standardized patients.
With virtual standardized patients	With virtual standardized patients	Medical students practice consultation with virtual standardized patients.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Perception differences between medical student using virtual standardized patients and physical standardized patients.	1 year	Perception questionnaire including satisfaction and acceptability. The questionnaire will use a 5-Point Likert Scale to assess the acceptance and satisfaction levels of physical standardized patients in comparison to virtual standardized patients among medical students. Here are some sample questions: S1: I am satisfied with how the "Virtual Standardized Patient System" operates.; 1. Strongly Disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neutral; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly Agree; S2: I am satisfied with the interactive process of medical history inquiries within the "Virtual Standardized Patient System."; 1. Strongly Disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neutral; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly Agree; S3: I am satisfied with the interactive process of medical condition explanations within the "Virtual Standardized Patient System."; 1. Strongly Disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neutral; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly Agree
Learning efficacy difference between medical student using virtual standardized patients and physical standardized patients.	1 year	The questionnaire will employ a 5-Point Likert Scale to investigate the learning effectiveness of medical students when comparing physical and virtual standardized patients. Below are some sample questions: PU2: I believe that the "Virtual Standardized Patient System" can be expected to enhance clinical learning.; 1. Strongly Disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neutral; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly Agree; PU3: I am of the opinion that the "Virtual Standardized Patient System" will facilitate clinical learning.; 1. Strongly Disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neutral; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly Agree; EE4: I find learning to use the "Virtual Standardized Patient System" to be a challenging skill to master.; 1. Strongly Disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neutral; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly Agree

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Medical Education, National Taiwan University Hospital; 🇨🇳 Taipei City, Taiwan