MedPath

Treatment Outcome With a Revascularization Protocol Using the Triple Versus Double Antibiotic Paste

Early Phase 1
Completed
Conditions
Pulp Necrosis
Interventions
Drug: Mineral Trioxide Aggregate
Drug: Double Antibiotic Paste
Registration Number
NCT00881491
Lead Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the treatment outcomes in permanent teeth with necrotic pulp and immature root development that undergo a regenerative procedure using a triple antibiotic paste (ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, minocycline) versus a double antibiotic paste (ciprofloxacin, metronidazole)compared to the commonly used mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) apexification treatment.

Detailed Description

Recent case series have reported positive outcomes treating necrotic immature permanent teeth with a regenerative procedure using a triple antibiotic paste (ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, minocycline). However, this method can result in considerable staining due to minocycline. In this randomized clinical trial, we will compare clinical outcomes of a triple antibiotic paste versus a double antibiotic paste (ciprofloxacin, metronidazole) intracanal medicament as compared to a standard treatment (immediate apexification with MTA) in permanent teeth with necrotic pulps and immature root development. We hypothesize there will be no significant differences between radiographic measures of root development after treatment with either the double versus triple antibiotic paste, and that both methods will produce significantly greater increases in root length and width compared to standard treatment. The primary outcome measures will be radiographic measurement of root length and dentinal wall thickness and the secondary outcomes will be lack of clinical symptoms and crown staining.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria
  • diagnosis of pulpal necrosis with apical periodontitis
  • patients 7-60 years of age
  • maxillary or mandibular restorable single rooted immature permanent tooth with open apices
  • acceptance of treatment plan with revascularization procedure
  • healthy patient (ASA Class I or II physical status) with no systemic health problems
Exclusion Criteria
  • non-restorable teeth
  • patients with ASA Class III or IV physical status (Immuno-compromised patients including patients who self-report to be a carrier of HIV, undergoing steroid therapy, or those who self-report with genetic or systemic diseases that could result in reduced immune response.
  • child subjects unable to give assent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group CMineral Trioxide AggregateGroup C - Mineral trioxide aggregate: used as an apical barrier
Group ADouble Antibiotic PasteGroup A - Double antibiotic paste: intracanal medicament consisting of ciprofloxacin and metronidazole
Group BTriple Antibiotic PasteGroup B - Triple Antibiotic Paste: intracanal medicament consisting of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, minocycline
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The primary outcome measures will be radiographic measurement of root length and dentinal wall thickness.3 measurements over 6 months

1. st radiograph taken at 1 month post-procedure completion

2. nd radiograph taken at 3 month post-procedure completion

3. rd radiograph taken at 6 month post-procedure completion

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The secondary outcomes will be lack of clinical symptoms and crown staining.assessed over the 6 month study period

1. st clinical assessment done at 1 month post-procedure completion

2. nd clinical assessment done at 3 month post-procedure completion

3. rd clinical assessment done at 6 month post-procedure completion

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

🇺🇸

San Antonio, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath