MedPath

Fast Ultra Low Dose CT Interpretation

Terminated
Conditions
Ultra-low-dose CT
Thoracic
Interventions
Device: ULDCT PACS prototype
Device: PACS viewer prototype
Device: Optimized ULDCT viewer prototype version(s)
Registration Number
NCT05748184
Lead Sponsor
Philips Electronics Nederland B.V. acting through Philips CTO organization
Brief Summary

An ultra-low-dose CT(ULDCT) image viewer prototype was developed in an iterative fashion that aims to reduce average interpretation times of ULDCT images. Ultimately, by reducing reading time of ULDCTs, we aim to enable general replacement of X-ray by ULDCT imaging, which is theorized to have large population-level health outcome impact in terms of early detection of lung cancer, coronary calcification, and aortic aneurysm, among others.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
4
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnostic radiologists, diagnostic radiology fellows, and diagnostic radiology residents employed by LUMC who read CTs and x-rays as part of clinical workflow.
  • Diagnostic radiologists, diagnostic radiology fellows, and diagnostic radiology residents who have been employed by LUMC who have read CT's and x-rays as part of clinical workflow.
  • Diagnostic radiologists, diagnostic radiology fellows, and diagnostic radiology residents who are visiting LUMC and who read CT's and x-rays as part of clinical workflow.
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent.
  • Interested and able to participate in at least two study arms, even if those have not yet been scheduled.
  • Proficient in Dutch and/or English.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Prior exposure to elements of the advanced reading environment, i.e., prior to the first research arm.
  • Not willing and able to provide informed consent. Contacts and Locations

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
RadiologistsPACS viewer prototype-
RadiologistsULDCT PACS prototype-
RadiologistsOptimized ULDCT viewer prototype version(s)-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Radiologist interpretation timeMeasured per reading session of about 4-5 hours (maximum 10 hours) and detailed out per CT reading case of about 3-20 minutes.

Average radiologist interpretation time (seconds / minutes) of all cases in the two applications. This Outcome Measure is measured through activity log of the prototype.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Emotional stateMeasured per reading session of about 4-5 hours (maximum 10 hours) and detailed out per CT reading case of about 3-20 minutes.

Average radiologist emotional state per case and per prototype application via video captures and gaze tracking. Emotional state is compared between prototype applications.

Arousal stateMeasured per reading session of about 4-5 hours (maximum 10 hours) and detailed out per CT reading case of about 3-20 minutes.

Average radiologist arousal state per case and per prototype application via wrist-based biometrics (heart rate variability in miliseconds, heart rate in beats per minute (bpm), skin conductance in uS), and eye tracking pupil diameter in milimeters.

Wrist band based biometricsMeasured per reading session of about 4-5 hours (maximum 10 hours) and detailed out per CT reading case of about 3-20 minutes.

Average radiologists' heart rate, heart rate variability and skin conductance compared between cases read per prototype applications.

ConfidenceMeasured per reading session of about 4-5 hours (maximum 10 hours) and detailed out per CT reading case of about 3-20 minutes.

Average radiologist confidence of all cases in the two applications. This Outcome Measure is measured through a questionnaire with responses on Likert scale.

Usability and user experienceMeasured per reading session of about 4-5 hours (maximum 10 hours) and detailed out per CT reading case of about 3-20 minutes.

Radiologist perceived usability feedback per prototype application through System usability scale (SUS), observed user errors per reading session (%), and open-ended feedback from a semi-structured interview summarized qualitatively.

SUS scores are compared between prototype applications and influence of learning/time on the SUS is analyzed.

Region of interaction. Frequency and duration eye tracking.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

🇳🇱

Leiden, Netherlands

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath