Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05091567
NCT05091567Active, not recruitingPhase 3

A Phase III, Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of Lurbinectedin in Combination With Atezolizumab Compared With Atezolizumab as Maintenance Therapy in Participants With Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Following First-Line Induction Therapy With Carboplatin, Etoposide and Atezolizumab

Hoffmann-La Roche147 sites in 12 countries660 target enrollmentStarted: November 18, 2021Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Active, not recruiting
Enrollment
660
Locations
147
Primary Endpoint
Randomized Phase: Independent Review Facility (IRF) - Assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Study GO43104 is a Phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter study of lurbinectedin in combination with atezolizumab compared with atezolizumab alone administered as maintenance therapy in participants with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) after first-line induction therapy with carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab. The study consists of 2 phases: an induction phase and a maintenance phase. Participants need to have an ongoing response or stable disease per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) v1.1 criteria after completion of 4 cycles of carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab induction treatment in order to be considered for eligibility screening for the maintenance phase. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lurbinectedin plus atezolizumab or atezolizumab in the maintenance phase.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • for the Induction Phase:
  • ECOG PS of 0 or 1
  • No prior systemic therapy for ES-SCLC
  • Treatment-free for at least 6 months since last chemo/radiotherapy, among those treated (with curative intent) with prior chemo/radiotherapy for limited-stage SCLC
  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed ES-SCLC
  • Adequate hematologic and end-organ function to receive 4 cycles of induction treatment with carboplatin, etoposide and atezolizumab
  • Measurable disease, as defined by RECIST v1.1
  • Negative HIV test and no evidence of active Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C at screening

Exclusion Criteria

  • for the Induction Phase:
  • Presence or history of CNS metastases
  • Active or history of autoimmune disease or deficiency
  • History of malignancies other than SCLC within 5 years prior to enrollment
  • Prior treatment with CD137 agonists or immune checkpoint blockade therapies, including anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, and anti-PD-L1 therapeutic antibodies, or lurbinectedin or trabectedin
  • History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia, drug induced pneumonitis, or idiopathic pneumonitis, or evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest computed tomography (CT) scan
  • Treatment with investigational therapy within 28 days prior to enrollment
  • Inclusion Criteria for the Maintenance Phase:
  • ECOG PS of 0 or 1
  • Ongoing response or stable disease per RECIST 1.1 after 4 cycles of induction therapy
  • Toxicities attributed to prior induction anti-cancer therapy or PCI resolved to Grade <=1
  • Adequate hematologic and end-organ function
  • Exclusion Criteria for the Maintenance Phase:
  • Presence or history of CNS metastases
  • Receiving consolidative chest radiation
  • Severe infection within 2 weeks prior to randomization into the maintenance
  • Treatment with therapeutic oral or IV antibiotics at the time of randomization

Arms & Interventions

Arm A: Atezolizumab+Lurbinectedin

Experimental

Induction phase: participants will receive standard of care atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with carboplatin on Day 1 and etoposide on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles.

Maintenance phase: participants will receive atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with lurbinectedin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Intervention: Etoposide (Drug)

Arm B: Atezolizumab

Active Comparator

Induction phase: participants will receive standard of care atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with carboplatin on Day 1 and etoposide on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles.

Maintenance phase: participants will receive atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Intervention: Atezolizumab (Drug)

Arm A: Atezolizumab+Lurbinectedin

Experimental

Induction phase: participants will receive standard of care atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with carboplatin on Day 1 and etoposide on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles.

Maintenance phase: participants will receive atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with lurbinectedin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Intervention: Atezolizumab (Drug)

Arm A: Atezolizumab+Lurbinectedin

Experimental

Induction phase: participants will receive standard of care atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with carboplatin on Day 1 and etoposide on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles.

Maintenance phase: participants will receive atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with lurbinectedin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Intervention: Lurbinectedin (Drug)

Arm A: Atezolizumab+Lurbinectedin

Experimental

Induction phase: participants will receive standard of care atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with carboplatin on Day 1 and etoposide on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles.

Maintenance phase: participants will receive atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with lurbinectedin on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Intervention: Carboplatin (Drug)

Arm B: Atezolizumab

Active Comparator

Induction phase: participants will receive standard of care atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with carboplatin on Day 1 and etoposide on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles.

Maintenance phase: participants will receive atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Intervention: Carboplatin (Drug)

Arm B: Atezolizumab

Active Comparator

Induction phase: participants will receive standard of care atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle in combination with carboplatin on Day 1 and etoposide on Days 1, 2, and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles.

Maintenance phase: participants will receive atezolizumab on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle.

Intervention: Etoposide (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Randomized Phase: Independent Review Facility (IRF) - Assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Time Frame: Up to 26 months

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented PD as determined by the IRF according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimetres (mm).

Randomized Phase: Independent Review Facility (IRF) - Assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Time Frame: Up to 26 months

PFS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented PD as determined by the IRF according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as appearance of a new lesion(s), unequivocal progression in non-target lesion(s) or at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on the study including baseline (nadir). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimetres (mm).

Randomized Phase: Overall Survival (OS)

Time Frame: Up to 26 months

OS was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Randomized Phase: Confirmed ORR as Determined by the Investigator(Up to 26 months)
  • Randomized Phase: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Determined by the IRF(Up to 26 months)
  • Randomized Phase: Duration of Response (DOR) as Determined by the IRF(Up to 26 months)
  • Randomized Phase: DOR as Determined by the Investigator(Up to 26 months)
  • Randomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS as Determined by the IRF at 6 Months and 12 Months(Months 6 and 12)
  • Randomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS Determined by Investigator at 6 Months and 12 Months(Months 6 and 12)
  • Randomized Phase: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)(Up to 26 months)
  • Randomized Phase: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab(Up to 26 months)
  • Randomized Phase: Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) in Physical Functioning (PF) and Global Health Status (GHS) as Measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQC30)(Up to 26 months)
  • Randomized Phase: Investigator-assessed PFS(Up to 26 months)
  • Randomized Phase: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Determined by the IRF(Up to 26 months)
  • Randomized Phase: Confirmed ORR as Determined by the Investigator(Up to 26 months)
  • Randomized Phase: Duration of Response (DOR) as Determined by the IRF(Up to 26 months)
  • Randomized Phase: DOR as Determined by the Investigator(Up to 26 months)
  • Randomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS as Determined by the IRF at 6 Months and 12 Months(Months 6 and 12)
  • Randomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With PFS Determined by Investigator at 6 Months and 12 Months(Months 6 and 12)
  • Randomized Phase: Percentage of Participants With OS at 12 Months and 24 Months(Months 12 and 24)
  • Randomized Phase: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)(Up to 26 months)
  • Randomized Phase: Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Atezolizumab(Up to 26 months)
  • Randomized Phase: Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) in Physical Functioning (PF) and Global Health Status (GHS) as Measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQC30)(Up to 26 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Industry
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (147)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Related News

FDA Approves Genentech's Tecentriq Plus Lurbinectedin as First-Line Maintenance Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer- The FDA has approved Genentech's Tecentriq in combination with lurbinectedin as the first and only combination therapy for first-line maintenance treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. - The Phase III IMforte study demonstrated that the combination reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 46% and the risk of death by 27% compared to Tecentriq alone. - The approval addresses a critical unmet need in ES-SCLC, a highly aggressive disease with limited treatment options and high relapse rates. - The regimen is now recommended as a category 2A and preferred option in National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for SCLC maintenance treatment.11 months agoJazz Pharmaceuticals Highlights Oncology Pipeline Expansion at JP Morgan 2025• Jazz Pharmaceuticals is focusing on expanding its oncology pipeline, with key developments expected for zanidatamab and Zepzelca. • A supplementary New Drug Application (sNDA) for Zepzelca as a frontline treatment for extended-stage SCLC is planned for submission in H1 2025. • Topline data from a Phase III trial of zanidatamab as a first-line therapy in gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas is expected in Q2 2025. • Zanidatamab is also being investigated for HER2+ breast cancer and HER2+ pan-tumors, with the goal of becoming the HER2-targeted therapy of choice.last yearFDA Approves Obecabtagene Autoleucel for R/R B-ALL; Advances in SCLC and Multiple Myeloma Highlighted- The FDA approved obecabtagene autoleucel (obe-cel) for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) based on the phase 1b/2 FELIX trial data. - Tarlatamab and lurbinectedin are shifting the treatment landscape for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) due to their improved toxicity profiles. - LBL-034, a bispecific antibody targeting GPRC5D and CD3, received orphan drug designation for multiple myeloma treatment and is being evaluated in a phase 1/2 trial.last yearSCLC Treatment Landscape Evolves with Tarlatamab Approval and Promising Trial Results- The FDA approved tarlatamab in May 2024 for SCLC that has progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy, marking a new treatment option in the second-line setting. - The ADRIATIC trial demonstrated that consolidation durvalumab significantly improved PFS and OS in patients with limited-stage SCLC after chemoradiation. - The IMforte trial showed that lurbinectedin combined with atezolizumab led to significant benefits in overall survival and progression-free survival as a maintenance therapy. - Research is exploring novel agents like B7-H3 targeted antibody-drug conjugates and DLL3-targeted bispecific T-cell engagers to further improve SCLC treatment outcomes.last yearLurbinectedin Plus Atezolizumab Shows Survival Benefit in ES-SCLC Maintenance- The Phase 3 IMforte trial demonstrated that lurbinectedin combined with atezolizumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in ES-SCLC patients. - The combination therapy was compared to atezolizumab alone as a maintenance treatment following induction therapy with carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab. - PharmaMar and Jazz Pharmaceuticals plan to submit regulatory applications to the FDA and EMA in the first half of 2025 based on these positive results. - The safety profile of the combination was consistent with the known profiles of each drug, with no new safety signals observed.last year
A Phase III, Open-Label Study of... | Clinical Trial