Evaluation of the Effects of Mefenamic Acid and Dexketoprofen on Postoperative Wisdom Dental Surgery
- Conditions
- Tooth DiseasesTooth, Impacted
- Interventions
- Procedure: Surgery of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth
- Registration Number
- NCT06280014
- Lead Sponsor
- Yuzuncu Yıl University
- Brief Summary
This study was administered to 22 female and 8 male patients. Patients with impacted wisdom teeth on both sides of the mandible were selected. After impacted tooth extraction, the patient used mefenamic acid on one side and dexketoprofen on the other side for postoperative pain relief. The effects of these two materials on patient comfort were investigated.
- Detailed Description
The aim of this study; to compare the effects of dexketoprofen and mefanamic acid on pain, edema and trismus after lower impacted wisdom teeth surgery. 60 impacted wisdom teeth in 30 healthy individuals who applied to Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery with an indication for extraction of impacted lower wisdom teeth were included in the study. 60 impacted wisdom teeth belonging to individuals were randomly divided into two groups (A and B). In a randomized, controlled, double-blind study, dexketoprofen (A) and mefanamic acid (B) were given to patients immediately after surgery. VAS (Visual Analog Scale) was used for pain assessment and assessment was made at 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours and 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 days. For the evaluation of edema, the facial measurements of the patients before the operation were recorded and repeated on the 2nd and 7th postoperative days. Preoperative maximum mouth opening measurement for trismus assessment was repeated on the 2nd and 7th postoperative days and recorded.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- Volunteers with bilateral fully impacted mandibular wisdom teeth
- Patients were excluded from the study if they did not understand the clinical procedures of the study,
- Had allergies or intolerance to any of the substances used in the study,
- Patients on anticoagulant or psychiatric treatment,
- Pregnant or breastfeeding,
- Patients using oral contraceptiveswere,
- Diabetic,
- Patients with periodontal disease or active infection,
- Poor oral hygiene
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Dexketoprofen was used to see post operative effects after extraction of 3rd molar in control group Surgery of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth Bilateral impacted wisdom teeth of the patients were randomly selected. After the tooth in the experimental group was extracted, the other impacted wisdom tooth was selected as the control group and dexketoprofen was used as a drug to see post operative effects. Mefenamic acid was used to see post operative effects after extraction of 3rd molar in study group Surgery of impacted mandibular wisdom teeth In this study of 30 patients, 22 females and 8 males, 60 fully impacted lower wisdom teeth were extracted bilaterally and in the same position. One of the bilaretal teeth of the patients was randomly selected and mefenamic acid was used as a drug to see post operative effects after extraction of impacted 3rd molars in the study group.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Facial edema 0-28 days Measurement between facial craniometric points (angulus-tragus, angulus-lateral canthus, angulus-nasal base, angulus-lateral canthus, and angulus-pogonion). The number of participants in the split mouth model was 22. A total of 44 impacted teeth were extracted and edema was measured before and 1 week after each extraction.
Mouth opening measurements 0-28 days The distance between the incisals of the patient's central teeth at maximal mouth opening.
Visual Analog Scale 0-28 days A numerical rating scale VAS was used for pain analysis (0=no pain, 10=most severe pain). The pain levels at 24 hours, 48 hours and 1 week after the surgical procedure were recorded on the patient follow-up form by all patients who participated in the study by explaining that there was no pain at the "zero" level and the most severe pain known at the "10" level on the pain scale, which was organized as a 10 cm horizontal line on the prepared forms.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Serap Keskin Tunc
🇹🇷Van, Turkey