MedPath

NHF vs. COT in Hypoxemic Pandemic Viral Illness

Not Applicable
Conditions
Acute Viral Bronchitis
Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
Interventions
Device: Nasal high-flow
Device: Standard oxygen
Registration Number
NCT04750408
Lead Sponsor
Jens Bräunlich
Brief Summary

The study compares oxygen and NHF in patients with acute viral illness. The duration will be 72h. After them physiological parameters and the outcome will be evaluated.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
52
Inclusion Criteria
  • acute hyperemic viral illness
  • acute hyperemic or hypercapnia respiratory failure
Exclusion Criteria
  • intubation criteria
  • indication for NIV therapy
  • influences of primary endpoint (rip fracture, lung embolism)
  • tracheostomy
  • other interventional trials
  • noncompliance

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
NHF useNasal high-flowPatients will use NHF instead of oxygen. Oxygen will be supplemented via the NHF flow.
Oxygen useStandard oxygenPatients will use standard oxygen via face mask of nasal prongs as usual care.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rox index72 hours

(SpO2/FiO2)/RR = index without a unit, mean Rox-index in the two groups, comparison between the groups (significant differences), physiological parameter, to assess differences between the two groups

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
paCO2 in mmHg72 hours

physiological parameter, to assess differences between the two groups

pH72 hours

physiological parameter, to assess differences between the two groups

escalation of therapy72 hours

use of noninvasive ventilation, intubation, to assess differences between the two groups

paO2 in mmHg72 hours

physiological parameter, to assess differences between the two groups

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Klinikum Emden

🇩🇪

Emden, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath