NHF vs. COT in Hypoxemic Pandemic Viral Illness
- Conditions
- Acute Viral BronchitisHypoxemic Respiratory FailureHypercapnic Respiratory Failure
- Interventions
- Device: Nasal high-flowDevice: Standard oxygen
- Registration Number
- NCT04750408
- Lead Sponsor
- Jens Bräunlich
- Brief Summary
The study compares oxygen and NHF in patients with acute viral illness. The duration will be 72h. After them physiological parameters and the outcome will be evaluated.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 52
- acute hyperemic viral illness
- acute hyperemic or hypercapnia respiratory failure
- intubation criteria
- indication for NIV therapy
- influences of primary endpoint (rip fracture, lung embolism)
- tracheostomy
- other interventional trials
- noncompliance
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description NHF use Nasal high-flow Patients will use NHF instead of oxygen. Oxygen will be supplemented via the NHF flow. Oxygen use Standard oxygen Patients will use standard oxygen via face mask of nasal prongs as usual care.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rox index 72 hours (SpO2/FiO2)/RR = index without a unit, mean Rox-index in the two groups, comparison between the groups (significant differences), physiological parameter, to assess differences between the two groups
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method paCO2 in mmHg 72 hours physiological parameter, to assess differences between the two groups
pH 72 hours physiological parameter, to assess differences between the two groups
escalation of therapy 72 hours use of noninvasive ventilation, intubation, to assess differences between the two groups
paO2 in mmHg 72 hours physiological parameter, to assess differences between the two groups
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Klinikum Emden
🇩🇪Emden, Germany