跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03773484
NCT03773484已完成不适用

Application of Economics & Social Psychology to Improve Opioid Prescribing Safety (AESOPS): R21 Pilot Phase

University of Southern California2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 41 人开始时间: 2019年3月25日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
41
试验地点
2
主要终点
Average Weekly Milligram Morphine Equivalent (MME)

研究概览

简要总结

There is a lack of evidence that long-term opioid use offers benefit for noncancer pain and an abundance of evidence of harm. The objective of the R21 pilot phase of the Application of Economics & Social psychology to improve Opioid Prescribing Safety (AESOPS) is to develop and test novel behavioral nudges to encourage adherence to pain and CDC guidelines for opioid prescribing for persons with noncancer pain. Interventions will leverage the electronic health record (EHR) to discourage unnecessary opioid prescribing through the application of "behavioral insights"-empirically-tested social and psychological interventions that affect choice.

详细描述

There is a lack of evidence that long-term opioid use offers benefit for noncancer pain and an abundance of evidence of harm. In 2017, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued the "CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain" to encourage safe and effective alternatives to opioids, discontinuation of opioids when patients do not resume normal activities and prudent dosing strategies. However, poor guideline adherence is a general concern and may impede uptake. Our prior studies have used insights from behavioral economics and social psychology to increase guideline adherence. The objective of the R21 pilot phase of the Application of Economics & Social psychology to improve Opioid Prescribing Safety (AESOPS) is to develop and test novel behavioral nudges to encourage adherence to pain and CDC guidelines for opioid prescribing for persons with noncancer pain. At the time of opioid prescribing, clinicians will be prompted with an EHR nudge when the prescribing history for the patient falls into one of the following three mutually exclusive categories: Opioid naïve, At-risk for long term use, or Long-term opioid recipient. The primary outcome is average weekly morphine milligram equivalents (MME) prescribed per-clinician.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • NM clinic that sees patients ≥ 18 years old whose leadership agrees to participate

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Average Weekly Milligram Morphine Equivalent (MME)

时间窗: 34 weeks

Average per-clinician weekly milligram morphine equivalent (MME) in the 34-week period post-intervention

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Jason Doctor

Professor

University of Southern California

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验