MedPath

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer After Curative Resection

Phase 3
Conditions
Cholangiocarcinoma
Gall Bladder Carcinoma
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT03779035
Lead Sponsor
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
Brief Summary

This prospective, open-Label, comparative, randomized, controlled phase III trial was designed to compare the clinical performance of gemcitabine with capecitabine vs. capecitabine alone for patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) after curative resection.

Detailed Description

Currently, complete surgical resection represents the only potentially curative treatment option for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA, including intrahepatic, hilar and distal CCA) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBCA). Because of high rates of disease recurrence and poor survival rates following surgical resection, postoperative treatment have been considered to improve patient survival after resection of BTC. The systematic review showed a beneficial impact of adjuvant treatment in BTC, particularly in patients with involved lymph nodes or resection margins and distal or hilar CCA. However, in regard of the paucity of randomized data, current guidelines recommend inclusion in clinical trials.

Previously, the data of the BILCAP trial showed an improvement in median overall survival for capecitabine compared to observation alone for BTC, indicating capecitabine as the new standard postoperative treatment after curative resection of BTC.

Previous phase II studies for advanced BTC showed superiority of the combination gemcitabine/ capecitabine regimen vs. the capecitabine monotherapy, the median OS was 12.7-14 vs. 7.9 months.

Based on these data, this AdBTC trial will was designed to compare the clinical performance of gemcitabine with capecitabine vs. capecitabine alone for patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) after curative resection, aiming for superiority of the combination regimen vs. the oral monotherapy. This will be based on the BILCAP protocol, applying the similar dosing, assessments and dose modifications.

The primary endpoint is DFS and secondary endpoints include recurrence free survival, OS, safety and tolerability of adjuvant CTx, quality of life, and patterns of disease recurrence.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
460
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Gemcitabine plus CapecitabineCapecitabineGemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter) on days 1 and 8 Capecitabine (1250 mg per square meter) twice a day on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Gemcitabine plus CapecitabineGemcitabineGemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter) on days 1 and 8 Capecitabine (1250 mg per square meter) twice a day on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
CapecitabineCapecitabineCapecitabine (1250 mg per square meter) twice a day on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Disease free survival (DFS) rateat 24 months

DFS

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The rate of patients with hepatic or locoregional recurrence24 months
Disease free survival (DFS) rateat 60 months

DFS

Overall survival (OS) rateat 60 months

OS

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Tianjin Medical University Cancer Insititute and Hospital

🇨🇳

Tianjin, Tianjin, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath