跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03779035
NCT03779035Unknown3 期

Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine and Capecitabine Compared to Capecitabine for Biliary Tract Cancer After Curative Resection

Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 460 人开始时间: 2018年12月15日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
3 期
入组人数
460
试验地点
1
主要终点
Disease free survival (DFS) rate

研究概览

简要总结

This prospective, open-Label, comparative, randomized, controlled phase III trial was designed to compare the clinical performance of gemcitabine with capecitabine vs. capecitabine alone for patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) after curative resection.

详细描述

Currently, complete surgical resection represents the only potentially curative treatment option for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA, including intrahepatic, hilar and distal CCA) and gallbladder carcinoma (GBCA). Because of high rates of disease recurrence and poor survival rates following surgical resection, postoperative treatment have been considered to improve patient survival after resection of BTC. The systematic review showed a beneficial impact of adjuvant treatment in BTC, particularly in patients with involved lymph nodes or resection margins and distal or hilar CCA. However, in regard of the paucity of randomized data, current guidelines recommend inclusion in clinical trials.

Previously, the data of the BILCAP trial showed an improvement in median overall survival for capecitabine compared to observation alone for BTC, indicating capecitabine as the new standard postoperative treatment after curative resection of BTC.

Previous phase II studies for advanced BTC showed superiority of the combination gemcitabine/ capecitabine regimen vs. the capecitabine monotherapy, the median OS was 12.7-14 vs. 7.9 months.

Based on these data, this AdBTC trial will was designed to compare the clinical performance of gemcitabine with capecitabine vs. capecitabine alone for patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) after curative resection, aiming for superiority of the combination regimen vs. the oral monotherapy. This will be based on the BILCAP protocol, applying the similar dosing, assessments and dose modifications.

The primary endpoint is DFS and secondary endpoints include recurrence free survival, OS, safety and tolerability of adjuvant CTx, quality of life, and patterns of disease recurrence.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Gemcitabine plus Capecitabine

Experimental

Gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter) on days 1 and 8 Capecitabine (1250 mg per square meter) twice a day on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

干预措施: Gemcitabine (Drug)

Gemcitabine plus Capecitabine

Experimental

Gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter) on days 1 and 8 Capecitabine (1250 mg per square meter) twice a day on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

干预措施: Capecitabine (Drug)

Capecitabine

Active Comparator

Capecitabine (1250 mg per square meter) twice a day on days 1-14. Treatment repeats every 3 weeks for 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

干预措施: Capecitabine (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Disease free survival (DFS) rate

时间窗: at 24 months

DFS

次要结局

  • The rate of patients with hepatic or locoregional recurrence(24 months)
  • Disease free survival (DFS) rate(at 60 months)
  • Overall survival (OS) rate(at 60 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验