MedPath

PET/CT Whole-body Dynamic Acquisition at FDG to Metastatic Melanoma Under Immunotherapy

Recruiting
Conditions
Metastatic Melanoma
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: value of 4D body-to-whole dynamic acquisition in FDG
Registration Number
NCT04272658
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Brest
Brief Summary

The value of 4D body-to-whole dynamic acquisition in FDG PET / CT to differentiate progression / pseudo-progression during the first therapeutic assessment (PET1) of metastatic melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)to predict the progression of the disease..

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
56
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient old ≥ 18 years
  • With metastatic melanoma
  • Treated with anti-PD1 : Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab or Combo IPI-Nivo
  • Having formulated a non-opposition
Exclusion Criteria
    • Minor patient < 18 years
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Other type of tumor than metastatic melanoma
  • Non-eligibility for the examination
  • Refusal of participation

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
value of 4D body-to-whole dynamic acquisition in FDGvalue of 4D body-to-whole dynamic acquisition in FDGdifferentiate pseudo-progression / progression during the first therapeutic assessment by FDG PET / CT (PET1) using data from the 4D whole-body dynamic acquisition, without having to re-evaluate closely. during a PET1 'this "unconfirmed progression" after 2 new treatment cures of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Values of the Ki absorption coefficient resulting from a FDG PET / CT full-body 4D dynamic acquisition to differentiate the pseudo-progression / progression of metastatic melanoma treated with ICI5 years
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Correlation between the Ki lesional values resulting from the 4D acquisition of the PET / CT from PET1 and PET0 the biological parameters (LDH, leucocytes, neutrophils) to differentiate pseudo-progression / progression5 years
Correlation between the Ki lesion values derived from PET1 and the quantitative parameters resulting from PET0 histological specifications of the tumors (% PD-L1, T-CD8 infiltration, PTEN status) to differentiate pseudo-progression / progression.5 years
Correlation between the Ki lesion values resulting from the 4D acquisition of FDG PET / CT for PET1 and the quantitative parameters resulting from PET0 to differentiate pseudo-progression / progression5 years
Correlation between lesional Ki values resulting from the 4D acquisition of FDG PET / CT for from PET1 and the quantitative parameters resulting from PET0 ICI- related adverse effect to differentiate pseudo-progression / progression5 years

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hospital University ff Brest

🇫🇷

Brest, Finistere, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath