MedPath

Early Initiation of Extracorporeal Life Support in Refractory OHCA

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Cardiac Arrest
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Sudden Cardiac Death
Interventions
Procedure: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR)
Registration Number
NCT03101787
Lead Sponsor
Maastricht University Medical Center
Brief Summary

Despite adequate conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) and attempted defibrillation, a considerable number of patients in cardiac arrest fail to achieve sustained return of spontaneous circulation. The INCEPTION trial is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial that will explore extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) in patients in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) presenting with ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia. It aims to determine the effect on survival and neurological outcome. Additionally, it will evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of ECPR.

Detailed Description

There are approximately 275,000 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) per year in Europe, of which two-thirds have a primary cardiac origin. However, despite adequate conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) and attempted defibrillation, a considerable number of these patients fail to achieve sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

Treatment of the underlying cause of the arrest, in most cases coronary artery occlusion, is paramount. But in the absence of ROSC, the possibilities to perform these life-saving interventions are limited. Continued CCPR is currently the standard of care for these patients. Initiation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) restores circulation, with the potential to minimize (or even reversing) organ damage, prevent re-arrest due to ischemia-triggered myocardial dysfunction and providing a bridge to possible diagnosis and treatment. Several studies have demonstrated that ECPR is feasible and may be advantageous with respect to survival and neurological outcome.

The INCEPTION trial aims to compare ECPR to CCPR in the population that is expected to benefit the most from this intervention: young patients presenting with ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia (VF/VT) and a refractory cardiac arrest. Furthermore, it will provide data on the cost-effectiveness of this intervention, which to date has been unavailable. Although the costs may prove to be high, the gain in quality-adjusted life years (QALY's) may be substantial given the fact that most patients are relatively young and the current alternative carries a poor prognosis. This can determine whether ECPR should be pursued as a standard of care in patients with refractory arrest.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
134
Inclusion Criteria
  1. ≥18 - ≤70 years
  2. Witnessed OHCA (by bystanders)
  3. Initial rhythm of VF/VT or AED administered
  4. Bystander BLS
Exclusion Criteria
  1. ROSC within 15 minutes of conventional CPR with sustained hemodynamic recovery
  2. Terminal heart failure (NYHA III or IV)
  3. Severe pulmonary disease (COPD GIII of GIV)
  4. Disseminated oncological disease
  5. Obvious or suspected pregnancy
  6. Bilateral femoral bypass surgery
  7. Known contraindications for ECPR
  8. Known pre-arrest CPC-score of 3 or 4
  9. Known limitations in therapy or a Do Not Resuscitate-order
  10. Multitrauma (Injury Severity Score >15)
  11. Expected time-to-start cannulation > 60 minutes

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
ECPR protocolExtracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR)Preclinical Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by emergency medical services (EMS) and transport to the emergency department with ongoing mechanical CPR and advanced cardiac life support (ACLS). Clinical The ECPR team is mobilized while the patient is transported to the hospital. Initiation of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). Time from arrest to start of cannulation is \< 60 minutes.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
30-day survival rate with favorable neurological status30 days

Favorable neurological status is defined as 1 or 2 on the using Cerebral Performance Category scale

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Costs per gained QALY for ECPR vs. CCPR1 year

What are the costs per gained QALY for ECPR vs. CCPR

Length of stay at the ICU1 year

Is there a difference in length of stay at the ICU between the treatment groups

Neurological outcome on the CPC scale30 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

Does ECPR improve the neurological outcome at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months on the CPC scale

Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY's)30 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

Does ECPR improve the amount of Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY's) at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

Reason for discontinuation of treatment between the treatment groupsWithin 1 year

Is there a difference in reason for discontinuation of treatment between the treatment groups

Time to return of circulationWithin 1 year

What is the time to return of circulation

Additional costs of ECPR with respect to CCPR1 year

What are the additional costs of ECPR with respect to CCPR

Length of stay at the hospital1 year

Is there a difference in length of stay at the hospital between the treatment groups

Duration of clinical rehabilitation time1 year

Is there a difference in the duration of clinical rehabilitation time

Duration of mechanical ventilation1 year

Is there a difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation between treatment groups

Need for renal replacement therapy1 year

Is there a difference in need for renal replacement therapy between the treatment groups

Acute kidney injury according to the RIFLE criteria1 year

Is there a difference in acute kidney injury according to the RIFLE criteria

Time to target hypothermia1 year

Is there a difference in time to target hypothermia between the treatment groups

Difference in metabolic markers between treatment groups6 days

Is there a difference in metabolic markers such as (1) pH, (2) etCO2, (3) ScVO2 and (4) lactate at arrival at the ED, right after initialization of circulation (either by ROSC or ECPR), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 hours after return of circulation and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 days after the OHCA between the treatment groups

Difference in metabolic markers between between the survivors and non-survivors6 days

Is there a difference in metabolic markers such as (1) pH, (2) etCO2, (3) ScVO2 and (4) lactate at arrival at the ED, right after initialization of circulation (either by ROSC or ECPR), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 hours after return of circulation and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 days after the OHCA between the survivors and non-survivors

Trial Locations

Locations (10)

Isala Klinieken

🇳🇱

Zwolle, Overijssel, Netherlands

Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht

🇳🇱

Utrecht, Netherlands

Maastricht UMC

🇳🇱

Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands

St. Antonius Hospital

🇳🇱

Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands

Catharina Ziekenhuis

🇳🇱

Eindhoven, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands

Academisch Medisch Centrum

🇳🇱

Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands

Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum

🇳🇱

Leiden, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands

Onze Lieve Vrouwen Gasthuis

🇳🇱

Amsterdam, Netherlands

HagaZiekenhuis

🇳🇱

Den Haag, Netherlands

Erasmus MC

🇳🇱

Rotterdam, Netherlands

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath