MedPath

Functional Performance of Voluntary Opening and Closing Body Powered Prostheses

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Upper Limb Amputation
Interventions
Device: Hosmer 5XA voluntary opening hook
Device: TRS Grip 3 voluntary closing hook
Registration Number
NCT02136238
Lead Sponsor
University of South Florida
Brief Summary

This study will compare the functional performance of voluntary opening (VO) and voluntary closing (VC) body powered prostheses. We hypothesize that the ability to sense cable tension and produce progressively higher pinch from shoulder force will result in advantages for the VC terminal device (TRS, Grip 3) in terms of proprioception and overall function. The specific aims of this clinical trial are to:

1. Determine if accommodation with a VC Grip 3 prehensor will result in reduced compensatory motion during activity.

2. Determine if accommodation with a VC Grip 3 prehensor will result in improved function in activities of daily living.

Detailed Description

To evaluate the performance of the prehensors, subjects will complete a randomized A-B crossover study with a subjective follow-up. Two subject categories will be evaluated: 1.) healthy non-amputees, and 2.) unilateral transradial amputee subjects who currently use, or are interested in using a body-powered prosthesis. We anticipate data collection data with 10 non-amputee subject, and 8 amputee subjects.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
18
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Prosthetic hand 1 (Hosmer 5XA)Hosmer 5XA voluntary opening hookThis arm of the study included unilateral transradial amputees who who were assessed while using prosthetic hand 1
Prosthetic hand 2 (TRS Grip 3)TRS Grip 3 voluntary closing hookThis arm of the study included unilateral transradial amputees who who were assessed while using prosthetic hand 2
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Sternal Displacement During Towel Folding TaskBased on preliminary experience with the intervention, accommodation can range from 1 month to 2 months. Assessment was scheduled within 1-2 weeks following accommodation.

Distance sternum is displaced while folding a towel was measured in meters.

Physical Function Performance 10 Test ScoreBased on preliminary experience with the intervention, accommodation can range from 1 month to 2 months. Assessment was scheduled within 1-2 weeks following accommodation.

Simulation of 10 activities of daily living (i.e. donning a shirt, sweeping, walking stairs). Measured in units of time, distance and mass to provide a singular, continuous scaled score of function (from 0-100). A score of 100 is the maximal score and indicates the highest level of independent function where a score of 0 indicates the poorest score. Persons scoring lower scores will likely be at increased risk of dependency with daily function.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of South Florida

🇺🇸

Tampa, Florida, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath