To compare two methods for preventing propofol injection pain.
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2019/02/017466
- Lead Sponsor
- Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
1.Patients of ASA physical status 1 and 2
2.Patients between 18 â?? 60 years of age of either sex
3.Patients able to comprehend and willing to participate.
4.Patients who are able to hold the sphygmomanometer up to 40 mm Hg for a period of at least 15 s
5.Patients in whom propofol is indicated for induction of anaesthesia.
1.Patientâ??s refusal to participate
2.Patients with known sensitivity to lignocaine or propofol
3.Patients on concomitant analgesic or sedative medication
4.Patients with presence of infection on the dorsum of the left hand
5.Patients in whom Valsalva manoeuvre is contraindicated (e.g. raised intracranial or intraocular pressure, glaucoma, retinopathy, middle ear pathology etc)
6.Patients who are unable to hold the sphygmomanometer up to 40 mm Hg for a period of at least 15 s
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method incidence and severity of pain on propofol injectionTimepoint: Immediately after propofol injection
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Haemodynamic effect of propofol administration on Valsalva manoeuvre.Timepoint: Baseline, before pretreatment, after pretreatment and after injection of propofol