MedPath

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Lastacaft® Compared to Pataday™ and Placebo in Patients With Acute Allergic Conjunctivitis

Registration Number
NCT01732757
Lead Sponsor
Allergan
Brief Summary

This study will evaluate the efficacy of Lastacaft® (Alcaftadine 0.25%) and Pataday™ (Olopatadine 0.2%) as compared to each other and to placebo in the prevention of ocular itching associated with allergic conjunctivitis.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
157
Inclusion Criteria
  • History of ocular allergies within the past 24 months.
  • Able to avoid wearing contact lenses for at least 72 hours prior to and during the study trial period.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Any presence of active ocular infection or history of an ocular herpetic infection.
  • Ocular surgery within 3 months prior to the first visit or refractive surgery within the past 6 months.
  • Have any planned surgery during the study or 30 days after the study.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Placebo (dextran 70 0.1%/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.3%)dextran 70 0.1%/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.3%One drop of Placebo (dextran 70 0.1%/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.3%) administered in both eyes on Day 0.
Lastacaft®Alcaftadine 0.25%One drop of Lastacaft® (Alcaftadine 0.25%) administered in both eyes on Day 0.
Pataday™Olopatadine 0.2%One drop of Pataday™ (Olopatadine 0.2%) administered in both eyes on Day 0.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Ocular Itching Evaluated by the Subject 3 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0Day 0 at 3 Minutes Post Challenge

Ocular itching is evaluated by the subject at 3 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score their ocular itching on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Incapacitating Itch with an Irresistible Urge to Rub (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less itching.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Ocular Itching Evaluated by the Subject at 5 and 7 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0Day 0

Ocular itching is evaluated by the subject at 5 and 7 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score their ocular itching on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Incapacitating Itch with an Irresistible Urge to Rub (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less itching.

Percentage of Subjects With Minimal Itching Score at 3, 5, and 7 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0Day 0

Ocular itching is evaluated by the subject at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score their ocular itching on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Incapacitating Itch with an Irresistible Urge to Rub (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). Minimal itching is considered a score \<1.

Percentage of Subjects With a Zero Itch Score at 3, 5, and 7 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0Day 0

Ocular itching is evaluated by the subject at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score their ocular itching on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Incapacitating Itch with an Irresistible Urge to Rub (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). Zero itch is considered a score = 0.

Percentage of Subject Eyes in Each Category of the Itching Score Distribution Post Challenge on Day 0Day 0

Ocular itching is evaluated by the subject at Hour 16 post challenge on Day 0. Subjects score their ocular itching on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Incapacitating Itch with an Irresistible Urge to Rub (0.5 increments are allowed).

Conjunctival Redness Evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0Day 0

The conjunctiva is a thin membrane that covers the inner surface of the eyelid and the white part of the eye. Conjunctival redness is evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Investigators score conjunctival redness on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Extremely Severe (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less conjunctival redness.

Ciliary Redness Evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0Day 0

Ciliary redness is redness spreading out around the cornea of the eye. Ciliary redness is evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Investigators score ciliary redness on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Extremely Severe (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less ciliary redness.

Episcleral Redness Evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0Day 0

The episclera is the tissue that lies over the white part of the eye. Episcleral redness is evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Investigators score episcleral redness on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Extremely Severe (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less episcleral redness.

Chemosis Evaluated by the Investigator at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0Day 0

Chemosis is swelling of the tissue that lines the eyelids and surface of the eye. Chemosis is evaluated by the investigator at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Investigators score chemosis on a 9-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 4=Severe (0.5 increments are allowed). For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less chemosis.

Eyelid Swelling Evaluated by the Subject at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0Day 0

Eyelid swelling is evaluated by the subject at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score eyelid swelling on a 4-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None to 3=Severe. For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less lid swelling.

Tearing Evaluated by the Subject at 7, 15, and 20 Minutes Post Challenge on Day 0Day 0

Tearing is evaluated by the subject at 7, 15, and 20 minutes post challenge on Day 0 (Visit 3B). Subjects score tearing on a 5-point numeric analog scale ranging from 0=None/Normal to 4=Very Severe. For each subject, the score for both eyes is averaged (i.e., one score per subject). A lower score is indicative of less tearing.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath