Vocabulary of children with Down syndrome

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: F01.525.200.310.250
Down Syndrome, Vocabulary, Child, Child Language, Child Development.
L01.143.506.598.901
M01.060.406
F01.525.200

Registration Number: RBR-2bz6v8

Lead Sponsor: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo

Brief Summary: Not available

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: Data analysis completed

Sex: Not specified

Target Recruitment: Not specified

Inclusion Criteria

Experimental Group (EG): to have a diagnosis of Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21); have been born at term; have not been born with very low weight; have results indicative of normality in the neonatal auditory, visual and metabolism screenings (mainly for congenital hypothyroidism); do not have characteristics of the Autism Spectrum Disorder; have visual skills to carry out the activities proposed; attend rehabilitation procedures since the first trimester of life; be attending regular school (public) and be in the age group between 36 the 62 months of chronological age.

Comparative group 1 (GC1) and Comparative Group 2 (GC2): to have typical neuropsychomotor development; have been born at term; have not been born with low weight; have results indicative of normality in the neonatal auditory, visual and metabolism screenings; do not have characteristics of the Autism Spectrum Disorder; have visual abilities to carry out the activities proposed; be paired according to gender, mental age (CG1), chronological age (CG2), school and socioeconomic status with the EG.

Exclusion Criteria

Presented: congenital hypothyroidism; born with very low weight; born preterm; signals of the Autism Spectrum Disorder; not initiated the rehabilitation procedures early and not attending school.

Study & Design

Study Type: Observational

Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Performance in expressive vocabulary of children with Down Syndrome lower than typically developing children, , after application of the test ABFW, check the percentages of correct appointment, no appointment and replacement processes and statistical analysis of these values.;After the statistical treatment, a statistically significant difference was verified in the comparison between the three groups regarding the skill naming correctly the image presented (p<0,001). It was possible to verify a statistically significant difference for the no designation (ND) in the comparison between the three groups by ANOVA (p<0,001). As the distribution of the scores in the skill processes of substitution did not present homogeneity, the Kruskal-Wallis test was performed. In this skill statistical analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p=0,928).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Difference in the comparison of children with Down syndrome typically developing children when considering the mental age in the application of ABFW test by checking the percentage of correct appointment, no appointment and replacement processes and submitting these results to statistical analysis.;There was no statistically significant difference between the group with Down syndrome and the group with typical development matched for mental age , neither of the skills (correct appointment, no appointment and replacement procedures) .