Comparison of ultrasound assessment for diaphragmatic workload during spontaneous breathing trial between Automatic tube compensation and pressure support ventilatio
Phase 4
- Conditions
- intubatedmechanical ventilatedweaningdiaphragm workloadsuccessful extubation predictiondiaphragm thickness fractiondiaphragm excursionpeak contraction velocitypeak relaxation velocityvelocity-time integralTDI-derived maximal relaxation rateintubatedmechanical ventilatedweaningdiaphragm workloadsuccessful extubation predictiondiaphragm thickness fractiondiaphragm excursionpeak contraction velocitypeak relaxation velocity
- Registration Number
- TCTR20210317004
- Lead Sponsor
- Self-funded
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Pending (Not yet recruiting)
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 48
Inclusion Criteria
admitted to ICU in Ramathibodi hospital
intubated and mechanically ventilated more than 48 hours
passed to spontaneous breathing trial
Exclusion Criteria
Contra-indicated for diaphragm ultrasound
Diaphragm pathology
Diagnosed neuromuscular pathology e.g. MG, ALS
Pregnancy
Inability to participate until the end of the trial
Withdrawal of informed consent
The incomplete data collection form
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method difference of diaphragm workload between ATC and PSV 30 minutes diaphragm thickness fraction
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method successful extubation prediction 2 hours diaphragm thickness fraction, diaphragm excursion, peak contraction velocity, peak relaxation velocity, velocity-time integral, TDI-derived maximal relaxation rate