MedPath

The Optimal Long Term Treatment Strategy of Anti-resorptive Medications

Phase 4
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Osteoporosis
Bone Mineral Density
Interventions
Drug: Continuous Denosumab
Drug: Administer zoledronate and denosumab on an alternating schedule
Registration Number
NCT05091086
Lead Sponsor
National Taiwan University Hospital
Brief Summary

This study is to investigate whether the alternating use of Prolia (Denosumab) and Aclasta (Zoledronic acid) can continue to increase bone density.

Detailed Description

This study intends to use a randomized trial to test whether the long-term treatment of Denosumab and Zoledronic acid can achieve sustained bone density progress and avoid the risk of rapid bone loss after the withdrawal of Denosumab.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Postmenopausal women or men over 50 years old with osteoporosis or osteopenia leading to fractures.
  2. Denosumab treatment for at least two years and less than three years (up to maximum of five doses).
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Secondary osteoporosis.
  2. Metabolic bone diseases.
  3. Malignancy.
  4. Continuous steroid treatment, hormone therapy or other medical treatment affecting bone metabolism.
  5. Patients had ever used antiosteoporosis medications other than Dmab
  6. Estimated glomerular filtration rate < 35 mL/min.
  7. Allergy to Zoledronate.
  8. Any other contraindications to Zoledronate use.
  9. History of diagnosed hypocalcemia.
  10. Age greater than 80 years.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Persistent treatment of Denosumab:Continuous Denosumabpersistent denosumab for 7 years
Alternating treatment of Denosumab and Zoledronic acidAdminister zoledronate and denosumab on an alternating scheduleAlternating treatment with denosumab and zoledronic acid over a 7-year period: after entering the trial, patients received one year of zoledronic acid, followed by two years of denosumab, then switched back to zoledronic acid for one year, followed by another two years of denosumab, and finally received one more year of zoledronic acid.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in lumbar spine bone mineral densityFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 years
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptideFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 years and 7 years
Fractures3 & 7 years

Number of Participants with clinical fractures and radiographic vertebral fractures

Change in quality of lifeFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 years and 7 years
Change in total hip bone mineral densityFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 years and 7 years
Change in femoral neck bone mineral densityFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 years and 7 years
Change in lumbar spine bone mineral densityFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 years
Change in C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagenFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 years and 7 years

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

National Taiwan University Hospital, Yunlin branch

🇨🇳

Douliu, Yunlin county, Taiwan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath