MedPath

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Cardiac Surgery Trial

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Cardiac Surgery
Interventions
Procedure: Sham
Procedure: Remote Ischemic Preconditioning
Registration Number
NCT01071265
Lead Sponsor
McMaster University
Brief Summary

Main Research Questions:

1. Is a large trial of patients undergoing heart surgery comparing a simple procedure of temporarily stopping blood flow to the leg with a blood pressure cuff (called remote ischemic preconditioning) to a sham procedure possible?

2. Does the remote ischemic preconditioning procedure before heart surgery help protect the heart and kidneys?

What is Being Studied:

A simple procedure known as remote ischemic preconditioning. The procedure is performed by inflating a pressurized cuff the thigh to temporarily stop blood flow to the arm or leg. This procedure causes the body to have a stress response that, at the cellular level, may protect major organs like the heart and kidney from the damage caused to them by the much larger stress of cardiac surgery. Reducing this damage may improve patient's recovery after surgery and help them live longer.

Why is this study important?:

This research is important because up to 1 in every 20 patients that undergo heart surgery die before even leaving hospital. Preventing heart and kidney damage at the time of surgery with remote ischemic preconditioning may reduce patient deaths.

Detailed Description

Annually, 2 million patients worldwide undergo heart surgery. Although this procedure can prolong life, 1 in 20 patients will not survive their hospital stay. Acute heart and kidney injuries are important causes of death after heart surgery. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a promising and simple therapy that may simultaneously reduce heart and kidney damage. RIPC involves the inflation of a tourniquet or blood pressure cuff on a limb to briefly stop blood flow to that limb. This period of no blood flow activates the body's own protective systems and releases protective chemicals into the blood that also protect the heart and kidneys. RIPC is a particularly attractive potential treatment because it may protect several organs at once, it has no known adverse effects and costs almost nothing. RIPC could therefore very easily be used globally to improve outcomes for all patients undergoing heart surgery. Although RIPC appears very promising in several small studies using different RIPC regimens there are no studies large enough to definitively evaluate whether RIPC improves patient important outcomes (e.g. survival, kidney failure, major heart attack, or stroke). Before performing a large trial to determine whether RIPC is effective, we must demonstrate that such a trial is feasible. We will determine the recruitment rate and adequacy of follow-up in an international group of centres to ensure that an adequately powered trial of RIPC compared to a sham procedure is possible. Further, we will ensure that our RIPC regimen is consistent with other trials in terms of effects on cardiac and kidney injury. This pilot trial will enroll 250 patients and randomize half to RIPC and half to a sham procedure. We call this trial the Remote IscheMia Preconditioning in cArdiaC surgery Trial (Remote IMPACT).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
250
Inclusion Criteria
  • undergoing cardiac surgery
  • at least 18 years old
  • EuroSCORE >= 6
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • requiring intra-aortic balloon pump support prior to surgery
  • unable to provide informed consent or decline to participate
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Sham RIPCShamInflation of thigh pneumatic tourniquet to \<15 mmHg
Active RIPCRemote Ischemic Preconditioning300 mmHg inflation of thigh pneumatic tourniquet for three cycles of 5 minutes each with 5 minutes of no inflation between cycles.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Peak CK-MB within 24 hours after surgery24 hours

Peak CK-MB within 24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Incidence of stroke6 months after surgery
Change in serum creatininewithin 4 days after surgery
All-cause mortality6 months after surgery
Need for Dialysis6 months after surgery
Length of hospital stayDischarge from hospital after surgery
Length of stay in the intensive care unitDischarge from hospital after surgery
Incidence of pneumonia30 days after surgery

Trial Locations

Locations (7)

McMaster University

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Maine Medical Centre

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Portland, Maine, United States

Wake Forest

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

University of Calgary

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Sunnybrook Hospital

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Lawson Health Research Institute

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

London, Ontario, Canada

Maritime Heart Centre

πŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Β© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath