Total hip replacement in older people with reduced bone quality: cemented versus cementless isoelastic pressfit anchored monoblock cup

Not Applicable

• Conditions: M16.1; Other primary coxarthrosis

• Registration Number: DRKS00024707
• Lead Sponsor: Waldkliniken Eisenberg GmbH

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2021-03-08
• Last Update Posted: 19 August 2024

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Pending
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 100

Inclusion Criteria

Age = 75years
- Coxarthrosis III-IV° according to K&L
- Preoperative periacetabular bone density with a T-score of = 1
- No previous operations on the ipsilateral hip joint
- No underlying malignant disease
- No underlying rheumatic disease

Exclusion Criteria

- Age <75 years
- periacetabular bone density with a T-score <1
- Previous surgery on the ipsilateral hip joint
- Known malignancy
- Underlying rheumatic disease
- Chromium, nickel or cement allergy

Study & Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Comparison of primary strength of Group A (cementless pressfit RM Vitamys cup) and Group B (cemented CCB cup) prostheses based on radiographic signs (secondary dislocation/loosening signs) 5 days postoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and at least 2 years postoperatively.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Comparison of clinical and subjective parameters of group A (cementless pressfit RM Vitamys cup) and group B (cemented CCB cup) prostheses of visual analog scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score.