MedPath

Exercise as a Buffer Against Stress-induced Overeating

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Obesity
Registration Number
NCT02936076
Lead Sponsor
The Miriam Hospital
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the psychological benefits of chronic exercise as well as the effects of exercise training on eating behaviors and stress-induced overeating in overweight and obese women. Participants will be randomized to an 12-week exercise condition or a delayed exercise condition. Assessments will occur at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks and will include answering surveys in real-time using smartphones, several assessments of eating behaviors and dietary intake, and questionnaire measures of factors which could mediate the relationship between exercise and eating. Participants will be compensated for completing assessments and for adherence to the exercise protocol.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
49
Inclusion Criteria
  • Female
  • 18-60 years of age
  • BMI 25 to <40 kg/m2
  • Physically inactive (<60 min/week of physical activity)
  • Must own a smartphone
  • Must be willing to receive and respond to text message prompts for 14 days at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks
Exclusion Criteria
  • Shift workers
  • Individuals who do not endorse stress-eating
  • Recent weight loss or current enrollment in a weight loss program
  • Women who are pregnant or plan on becoming pregnant in the next 6 months
  • Any medical condition that would limit participation in physical activity
  • Diabetes
  • Inability to walk without an assisted device
  • Inability to meet exercise recommendations
  • Failure to adequately complete all baseline assessment measures

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Stress-induced Overeating Measured Via Smartphone Surveys12 weeks

Participants completed EMA surveys (5x/day for 14 days). At each prompt they were asked if an eating episode occurred. If they indicated 'yes', they were asked to check all that apply: a) I ate past the point of feeling full, b) I ate more than usual, c) I had unplanned eating (i.e., consumed food when I don't usually eat and was not making up for a missed meal, or d) None of the above. If the participant responded with a, b, or c, it was classified as an 'overeating episode'. Further, at each prompt, participants were asked to the respond to the following: 'Right now I feel stressed' (1=not at all, 7=very much so). If the stress score was \>=5 at the prompt just prior to an overeating episode, then it was considered a 'stress-induced overeating episode'.

Percentage of Overeating Episodes Characterized as 'Overeating'12 weeks

If an eating episode occurred, participants were asked to check all that apply: a) I ate past the point of feeling full, b) I ate more than usual, c) I had unplanned eating (i.e., consumed food when I don't usually eat and was not making up for a missed meal, or d) None of the above. If response was a, b, or c, it was classified as an 'overeating episode'.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Stress as Measured Via QuestionnaireBaseline and 12 weeks

The 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen 1988) was used to assess changes in stress by treatment arm from baseline to 12 weeks. Scores on this measure range from 0-40 with a higher score indicating greater perceived stress. Presented values are 12 week scores adjusted for baseline values.

Change in Body Weight (% Initial Weight)baseline and 12 weeks

Percent weight change from baseline to 12 weeks

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center

🇺🇸

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Weight Control and Diabetes Research Center
🇺🇸Providence, Rhode Island, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.