Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01191606
NCT01191606
Unknown
Phase 2

Pressure-controlled Versus Volume-controlled Ventilation During Protective One Lung Ventilation for Thoracic Surgery

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital1 site in 1 country34 target enrollmentJune 2010

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Arterial Oxygenation During Protective One Lung Ventilation
Sponsor
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Enrollment
34
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
arterial oxygenation differences
Last Updated
15 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to determine the effects of pressure controlled ventilation during protective one lung ventilation on blood gases, airway pressures and hemodynamic variables compared with volume controlled ventilation.

Detailed Description

One-lung ventilation (OLV) during thoracic surgery, in particular, video-assisted thoracic surgery is a standard practice to facilitate surgical exposure, but arterial hypoxemia has been a serious complication during one lung ventilation. Furthermore, recent studies have shown that one lung ventilation with a conventional tidal volume can involve lung injury associated with alveolar overdistension and high airway pressure. Therefore, lung protective ventilation with a low tidal volume during one lung ventilation has been suggested, and a recent study showed that protective ventilation during lung cancer surgery was associated with improved postoperative respiratory outcomes such as reduced incidence of acute lung injury and atelectasis. During protective one lung ventilation limiting airway pressure and using low tidal volume, it is important to provide uniform alveolar expansion and maintain adequate oxygenation. A previous study suggested that the decelerating inspiratory flow delivery used in pressure controlled ventilation improved ventilation/perfusion distribution and arterial oxygenation during one lung ventilation5. Moreover, according to a recent study during laparoscopic obesity surgery, pressure-controlled ventilation improved oxygenation compared with volume controlled ventilation, which was associated with higher instantaneous flow peaks and a better alveolar recruitment6. On the other hand, other studies showed that ventilatory mode during one lung ventilation did not affect arterial oxygenation. However, these studies were performed during mechanical ventilation using conventional tidal volume, and the effect of ventilatory mode during protective one lung ventilation on oxygenation has not been clearly determined yet.The aim of this study is to determine the effects of pressure controlled ventilation during protective one lung ventilation on blood gases, airway pressures and hemodynamic variables compared with volume controlled ventilation.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 2010
End Date
December 2010
Last Updated
15 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • patients (ASA physical status I-III) undergoing elective thoracic surgery in the lateral position with at least 1 h of one lung ventilation

Exclusion Criteria

  • patients with major organ dysfunction, hemodynamic instability, or increased intracranial pressure

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

arterial oxygenation differences

Time Frame: four time points during operation

(1) during two-lung ventilation using VCV before initiation of OLV (baseline); (2) during OLV 30 min after the first randomized ventilation mode; (3) 30 min after the second ventilation mode; and (4) 30 min after reestablishing two-lung ventilation.

Secondary Outcomes

  • mean inspiratory pressure (Pmean)(four time points during operation)
  • plateau inspiratory pressure (Pplateau)(four time points during operation)
  • peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak)(four time points during operation)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials