Construction and Educational Impact of Plastination Models of the Limbic System, Basal Nuclei, Cerebellum, and Human Spinal Cord
- Conditions
- EducationEducation, MedicalEducation, Medical, Undergraduate
- Registration Number
- NCT06991933
- Lead Sponsor
- Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Purpose:
This educational trial aims to assess whether plastination models for neuroanatomy training (limbic system, basal ganglia, cerebellum, spinal cord)" improve medical students' understanding of central nervous system anatomy compared to traditional educational methods. It will also evaluate student satisfaction with this teaching tool.
Key Questions:
1. Do plastination models for neuroanatomy training (limbic system, basal ganglia, cerebellum, spinal cord) enhance test scores in neuroanatomy examinations?
2. How do students perceive the educational value of these models?
Study Design:
Researchers will compare two teaching methods:
* Intervention group: Learns using plastination models for neuroanatomy training (limbic system, basal ganglia, cerebellum, spinal cord)
* Control group: Learns using standard 2D atlases, power point and plastic models
Participants will:
1. Complete a pre-intervention anatomy knowledge test
2. Attend 4 weekly neuroanatomy sessions using their assigned method
3. Take a post-intervention exam and satisfaction survey
4. Participate in focus groups about their learning experience
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Medical students in their third semester of training
- Currently enrolled in neuroanatomy coursework at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
- No prior formal training with plastinated models
- Willing to attend all study sessions for 7 weeks
- Able to complete assessments in persian
- Prior experience with plastinated models
- Currently taking neuroanatomy remediation courses
- Planned absences during >20% of study sessions
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in neuroanatomy knowledge scores assessed by the "Neuroanatomy Knowledge Assessment Test Baseline, Week 4 post-intervention Scale Title: Neuroanatomy Knowledge Assessment Test (NKAT). Score Range: 0 (no correct answers) to 15 (all answers correct). Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better neuroanatomy knowledge (better outcome).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Spatial understanding assessment Post-intervention only Method: 3D spatial reasoning test (modified Vandenberg scale)
Scoring: 1-5 Likert scale for structure identification accuracyStudent satisfaction assessed by the 10-item Student Satisfaction Survey (SSS) Immediately after the intervention (Day 1) * Score Range: 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
* Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction (better outcome).
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.