Lung Function and Patient Preference With QVA149 vs. Tiotropium in COPD Patients
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseCOPD
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT02125734
- Lead Sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Brief Summary
The study is a multicenter, randomized, 2-period, open-label, two arm, cross-over study to show the superior effect of a 4 week treatment each with QVA149 versus tiotropium on lung function. Similarly, this study aims to evaluate patient preference after experiencing both treatment regimens in patients with a clinical diagnosis of COPD (GOLD 2013) and a moderate to severe airflow limitation who are symptomatic (defined as CAT score of at least 10) at screening despite being treated with tiotropium
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 88
- signed an Informed Consent Form
- stable COPD according to current guidelines (GOLD 2013)
- airflow limitation indicated by a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio of <0.70 and a post-bronchodilator FEV1 of ≥30% and <80% of predicted normal values at Visit 2.
- current or ex-smokers who have a smoking history of at least 10 pack years
- Patients on stable tiotropium (18 µg/d) monotherapy for at least 8 weeks before Visit 1
- Symptomatic patients defined as patients with CAT score ≥ 10 at Visit 1 (Screening).
- Pregnant or breast feeding mothers
- Patients with conditions contraindicated for treatment
- Patients with a history of clinically significant diseases
- Patients who have a clinically significant renal disease
- Patients with myocardial infarctions less than 6 months prior to study entry
- Patients with recent (less than 1 year) history of NYHA Class III/IV left ventricular failure.
- Patients with narrow-angle glaucoma, symptomatic prostatic hyperplasia or bladder-neck obstruction or urinary retention
- Patients with a history of malignancy of any organ system
- Patients who have had a COPD exacerbation that required treatment with antibiotics, and/or systemic steroids (oral or intravenous) and/or hospitalization in the 6 weeks prior to Screening
- Patients who have had a respiratory tract infection within 6 weeks prior to Screening
- Patients with any history of asthma.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Treatment sequence 1 QVA149 QVA149 from day 1 to day 28 and tiotropium from day 29 to day 56 Treatment sequence 1 Tiotropium QVA149 from day 1 to day 28 and tiotropium from day 29 to day 56 Treatment sequence 2 QVA149 Tiotropium from day 1 to day 28 and QVA149 from day 29 to day 56 Treatment sequence 2 Tiotropium Tiotropium from day 1 to day 28 and QVA149 from day 29 to day 56
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at 1 h Post-inhalation week 4 Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) will be calculated as the volume of air forcibly exhaled in one second as measured by a spirometer.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Investigator Preference Per Patient After Experiencing Both Treatments for Future Suggestions. 8 weeks The investigator preference for future treatment suggestion after experiencing both treatments was assessed at the end of treatment period 2 with the Investigator Preference Questionnaire
Patient Preference After Experiencing Both Treatments Was Assessed at the End of Treatment Period 2 With a Patient Preference Questionnaire. 8 weeks Patient preference after experiencing both treatments. The patient's preference questionnaire was a two-choice question (preference for QVA149 OR Tiotropium.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Novartis Investigative Site
🇩🇪Warendorf, Germany