Resistant Starch and Satiety
- Conditions
- Healthy Adults
- Registration Number
- NCT01187875
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Minnesota
- Brief Summary
Dietary fiber consumption may contribute to weight regulation by improving satiety. In an earlier study the investigators found that a muffin containing resistant starch was more effective than other fibers in altering satiety. The objective of this study is to determine if 2 resistant starches consumed in muffins alter satiety and whether a mixture of resistant starches is more effective than either alone in enhancing satiety.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Healthy men and women
- Age 18-64 years
- Non-smoking
- Not taking medication
- Non dieting (weight stable in prior 3 months)
- BMI 18-27
- English literacy
- Do not regularly consume breakfast
- Food allergies to ingredients found in the study products
- BMI <18 or >27
- Diagnosed cardiovascular disease, renal disease, hepatic disease, or diabetes mellitus
- Cancer in previous 5 years
- Any gastrointestinal disease or condition
- Recent bacterial infection (< 3months)
- Recent or concurrent participation in an intervention research study
- History of drug or alcohol abuse in prior 6 months
- Use of lipid lowering, anti-hypertensive, or anti-inflammatory steroid medication
- Eating disorder
- Vegetarians
- People who eat more than approximately 15 grams of fiber per day
- Women who are pregnant or lactating
- Women with irregular menstrual cycles
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Satiety response using visual analogue scales 0 minutes postprandially Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS).
Satiety response using VAS 240 minutes postprandially Satiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ad libitum food intake 240 minutes postprandially and over 24 hours Breath hydrogen response 0, 240 minutes Gastrointestinal tolerance using visual analogue scales (VAS) 24 hours Subjective ratings of bloating, stool consistency, and flatulence on VAS. A stool count was also recorded.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Minnesota
🇺🇸Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
University of Minnesota🇺🇸Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States