Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) for Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD)
- Conditions
- Body Dysmorphic Disorder
- Registration Number
- NCT00871143
- Lead Sponsor
- Institute of Psychiatry, London
- Brief Summary
The aim of the research is to determine if Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) specific for BDD is more effective than a credible non-specific form of CBT for treating BDD and its delusional variant in adults aged 17 or over. This will be done in a single centre randomised controlled trial that compares specific CBT for BDD versus non-specific CBT over 12 weeks. The hypotheses to be tested are that: (1) specific CBT for BDD will be more effective than non-specific CBT at 12 weeks (2) Treatment effects from Specific CBT will be maintained at 1 month follow up. The main study end-point is at 12 weeks and the secondary end-point is at 1 month follow up. A secondary aim is to explore whether delusionality (insight) as measured by the Brown Assessment of Beliefs and co-morbid depressed mood predicts response to treatment.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 46
- BDD is the main psychological problem. We will use DSMIV criteria as BDD does not exist as a separate diagnosis in ICD10. They may have an additional diagnosis of Delusional Disorder when it refers to beliefs about being ugly or defective.
- They must have a total of 24 or more on the twelve-item YBOCS modified for BDD (Phillips et al., 1997).
- They may be of either gender but must be 17 years or above.
- They are willing to travel to the treatment centre for weekly sessions.
- They are wiling to complete regular questionnaires and be audiotaped for supervision and for listening to enhance their learning.
- They may be taking psychotropic medication so long as it is stabilised and there are no plans to increase the dose.
- They have a current or past diagnosis of schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder.
- They have current suicidal intent or severe self-neglect that requires hospitalisation.
- They have a current alcohol or substance dependence or anorexia nervosa or borderline personality disorder that requires treatment in its own right.
- They are currently receiving any other form of psychotherapy,
- They have received CBT for BDD in the past 6 months, which is judged as competently delivered and did not respond.
- They cannot speak sufficient English for CBT. (Assistance will be provided for those who speak English but are unable to read questionnaires).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Modified for BDD) (BDD -YBOCS) (Phillips et al., 1997) 12 weeks, 1 month post treatment This is a clinician-rated scale administered by a trained blinded assessor. The range is 0-48. Cronbach's α for the scale is 0.80. Response to treatment is defined as a 30% or greater decrease in the total BDD-YBOCS score, which best corresponded to 'much improved' on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. In the original validation study, this cutoff score produced 1 false negative (96% sensitivity), that is, 1 participant who was rated as much or very much improved on the CGI was not classified as a responder on the BDD-YBOCS using the 30% threshold.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Brown Assessment of Beliefs to Measure the Strength of Conviction in Beliefs About Being Ugly (Eisen et al., 1998) 12 weeks, 1 month post treatment BABS is a 7-item clinician scale rated by a blinded assessor to measure the strength of conviction in a belief (e.g. 'I am as ugly as the Elephant man'); each item is rated from 0 ('non-delusional belief, or least pathological') to 4 ('delusional belief, or most pathological') and the total scores range from 0 to 24; higher scores represent an increasing delusionality of beliefs; respondents are classified as having delusional BDD beliefs if their total score is 18 or more, and if they score 4 on the first item, indicating they are completely convinced that their belief is accurate.
Appearance Anxiety Inventory (AAI) 12 weeks, 1 month post treatment The AAI is a 10- item self-report questionnaire for measuring the frequency of avoidance behaviour and threat-monitoring (e.g. checking, self-focussed attention) that are characteristic of a response to a distorted body image; each item is scored from 0 ('not at all') to 4 ('all the time'), and the range of the total scores is 0-40, with higher scores reflecting a greater frequency of the responses; the AAI has a Cronbach's α of 0.86.
Body Image Quality of Life Inventory (BIQLI) 12 weeks, 1 month post treatment The BIQLI is a 19-item self-report scale that measures the impact of body image concerns on a broad range of life domains (e.g. sense of self, social functioning, sexuality, emotional well-being, exercise and grooming); the BIQLI is scored as the average numeric score of all the items from -3 ('very negative effect') to +3 ('very positive effect'); Cronbach's α for the scale is 0.95.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (Montgomery and Asberg, 1979). 12 weeks, 1 month post treatment MADRS is a 10-item clinician scale rated by a blinded assessor to measure symptoms of depression; each item is rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (indicating 'normal' or 'no difficulties') to 6, and the range is 0-60; higher scores reflect a greater symptomatology; a MADRS total score of ≥ 25 is regarded as moderate, and of \>31 as severe.
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 12 weeks, 1 month post treatment The PHQ is a 9-item self-report measure of depression; each item is scored from 0 ('not at all') to 3 ('nearly every day'),and the summed total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores reflecting a greater symptomatology of depression; Cronbach's α for the scale is 0.89.
Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-7 12 weeks,1 month post treatment The GAD-7 is a 7-item self-report measure for symptoms of generalised anxiety; each item is scored from 0 to 3, and the summed total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores reflecting a greater symptomatology; Cronbach's α for the measure is 0.92.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
South London and Maudsley NHS Trust
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
South London and Maudsley NHS Trust🇬🇧London, United Kingdom