Enhancing the Efficacy of Smoking Quit Line in the Military (AFIII Renewal)
- Conditions
- Initial Efficacy of Quit LineEfficacy of Secondary Reengagement Intervention
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Choice GroupBehavioral: Recycling GroupBehavioral: Rate reduction interventionBehavioral: Proactive QL
- Registration Number
- NCT02201810
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Virginia
- Brief Summary
This study is a randomized clinical trial designed to measure the effectiveness of three QL interventions for smokers who failed to quit an initial smoking cessation intervention, but remain motivated to quit smoking.
- Detailed Description
In the investigators' previous QL protocol, FWH20080093H, the investigators documented that a military-tailored QL was associated with high rates of sustained smoking cessation. The proactive QL produced superior cessation rates at a one year follow-up compared to a reactive QL. Unfortunately, even with high rates of cessation, a large number of participants (the majority of participants) fail to remain quit at follow-up. Civilian QLs have observed the same marked decay of sustained cessation rates from the end of treatment to the one year follow-up.
An opportunity exists to reengage these smokers who relapse or fail to quit by the end of QL treatment. Civilian QLs use one of two treatments, Recycling (repeat the smoking cessation counseling) or Rate Reduction (cut down over time), as the primary methods for treatment reengagement. Unfortunately, these methods of reengaging the relapsed/failed to quit smoker have not been systematically evaluated. As such, we propose to randomize participants who relapse or fail to quit by the end of the intervention to either (1) repeating the proactive QL (Recycle); (2) smoking reduction with the goal of eventual cessation (Rate Reduction); or (3) the choice of Recycle or Rate Reduction (Choice). Efficacy will be established by assessing both point prevalence and continuous abstinence at a 12 month follow-up.
All participants (approximately 1900) are consented to follow-up treatment reengagement since we do not know a priori who will quit and who will not quit/relapse. The investigators anticipate, based on the investigators' QL study that about 30% will quit and remain quit based on the eight-week proactive QL and about 70% will either not quit or relapse (nâ1300). Those that are smoking at the three-month follow-up are stratified (based on whether they quit and relapsed vs. not quitting at all in the Proactive QL based upon self-report) and randomized to the three treatment reengagement strategies (Recycle, Rate Reduction, or Choice), each one lasting 8 weeks. Then, at one year follow-up, the investigators will assess both point prevalence and continuous abstinence. Since we are intervening on those that initially failed to quit or relapsed, continuous abstinence will be defined from the point of the last treatment reengagement intervention (one year from that point).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 614
To be included, individuals will be
- Active Duty, Retired, or Dependent with Tricare benefits
- Participants must be at least 18 years old
- Smoked five or more cigarettes a day for at least one year
- Live in the 48 contiguous states, Alaska or Hawaii
- Participants must have the ability to understand consent procedures, and have access to a telephone for participation
- Seriously thinking of quitting smoking cigarettes in the next 30 days
- Persons who have a known or unknown knowledge of an allergy or hypersensitivity to Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT)
- Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant during the next 12 months
- Persons diagnosed with an unstable heart condition will be excluded as NRT is contraindicated in these groups
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 2nd level intervention: Choice Choice Group Choice Group 2nd level intervention: Recycling Recycling Group Recycling Group 2nd level intervention: Rate Reduction Rate reduction intervention Rate reduction intervention 2nd level intervention: Rate Reduction Proactive QL Rate reduction intervention 2nd level intervention: Recycling Proactive QL Recycling Group 2nd level intervention: Choice Proactive QL Choice Group
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Effectiveness of randomized reengagement interventions From 3 months follow up to 1 year follow up We will assess tobacco status (both 7-day point prevalence and continuous abstinence) at the follow-up period (one year after reengagement interventions are completed) to assess outcome.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method One-year outcome from the initially successful group that quit smoking 1-yr after initial randomization
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center
đşđ¸Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, United States