The Effects of Electronic Cigarette and Traditional Cigarette
- Conditions
- Cigarette Addiction
- Registration Number
- NCT07131891
- Lead Sponsor
- Atılım University
- Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to investigate and compare the effects of traditional cigarette and e-cigarette consumption habits on sleep quality, fatigue, mental health and quality of life.
- Detailed Description
E-cigarettes are battery-powered devices that vaporize a solution containing or not containing nicotine. Carcinogens and other toxins in e-cigarettes can have negative effects on physical health, and their potential negative effects on mental health are also a concern. Adults in the US experiencing serious psychological distress are reported to be more likely to use traditional cigarettes (tobacco), e-cigarettes, or both than adults without serious psychological distress. A relationship between traditional cigarette smoking and mental illness and depression is well-known. Recent studies have also found that depressive symptoms are associated with e-cigarette use. A study comparing the relationship between different cigarette products and depressive symptoms found that dual use (traditional cigarettes and e-cigarettes) in young adults was associated with higher depressive symptoms than single-use.
Another mental health factor associated with smoking is sleep health. Nicotine is thought to be the mechanism linking traditional cigarette use to sleep disorders, as acute withdrawal during the night can cause uncomfortable and sleep-disrupting physiological symptoms. This relationship is also seen in e-cigarette users. In a study conducted with university students, e-cigarette users reported poorer sleep health compared to non-smokers. Smoking and e-cigarette use are also known to affect fatigue and quality of life. Cao et al. evaluated non-smokers, traditional cigarette users, e-cigarette users, and both in terms of fatigue and quality of life. They reported that non-smokers had the lowest fatigue and highest quality of life among these four groups. The e-cigarette user group had less fatigue and higher quality of life than the traditional cigarette user group. Various studies in the literature compare e-cigarette and traditional cigarette users in terms of fatigue, sleep quality, depression, mental health, and quality of life. However, there are insufficient studies evaluating all parameters and investigating their relationship with each other. Therefore, we believe our study will contribute to the literature in this area.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 533
- Male and female individuals between the ages of 18-65
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Fatigue Severity Scale From enrollment to the end of the assessment period at 2 hours Individuals' fatigue severity will be assessed using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). The scale consists of 9 questions. Participants are questioned about their level of fatigue over the past week. Questions are scored from 1 to 7. The Likert-type scale is used, with 1 point representing "strongly disagree" and 7 points representing "strongly agree," with higher scores indicating greater agreement. A net score is obtained by calculating the arithmetic mean of all questions. The highest possible score is 7. Scores of 4 and above indicate pathological fatigue. The validity and reliability study of the FSS has been conducted in the Turkish language.
Jenkins Sleep Scale From enrollment to the end of the assessment period at 2 hours The Jenkins Sleep Scale consists of four questions that assess sleep problems over a 4-week period. Each question is scored from 0 to 5. The total score ranges from 0 to 20 and indicates increasing sleep disturbance.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS 21) From enrollment to the end of the assessment period at 2 hours The 21-item "Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS 21)" will be administered to determine individuals' depression, anxiety, and stress levels. The scale was first developed by Lovibond and Lovibond (12) with 42 items. Subsequently, Brown et al. (13) determined that a shorter form was valid enough to perform the same measurement, and the 21-item "Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS 21)" was created. Yılmaz et al. (14) adapted the DASS 21 into Turkish. The scale, which measures depression, stress, and anxiety subscales and consists of 21 questions with 7 items for each subscale, is a 4-point Likert-type scale (0: Does not apply to me, 1: Applies to me somewhat, 2: Generally applies to me, and 3: Applies to me completely). All items on the scale are scored positively, and each subscale is evaluated by classifying it as normal, mild, moderate, severe, and very severe.
Epworth Sleepiness Scale From enrollment to the end of the assessment period at 2 hours This scale was developed to assess daytime sleepiness. It consists of a total of eight items, with four different response options ranging from 0 to 3 for each item, and the total score ranges from 0 to 24. The higher the total score, the greater the individual's degree of daytime sleepiness. The scale's validity and reliability in Turkish was conducted by İzci et al. in 2008.
Short Form-36 From enrollment to the end of the assessment period at 2 hours Quality of life was assessed using the Turkish version of the Short Form 36 (SF-36) (18). The SF-36 assesses quality of life under eight subscales: physical function, physical role difficulty, pain, general health, vitality, social function, emotional role difficulty, and mental health. Scores for each subscale are calculated separately. Subscale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. A total score is not calculated.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Atılım University
🇹🇷Ankara, Turkey
Atılım University🇹🇷Ankara, Turkey