跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00226018
NCT00226018已完成4 期

Performance of Acceleromyography With and Without Preload During Neuromuscular Blockade

Rigshospitalet, Denmark2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2005年3月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
The precision of acceleromyography with and without preload during recovery

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to examine the precision, bias and limits of agreement when monitoring the neuromuscular block with acceleromyography with and without preload and compare the method to the gold standard, mechanomyography.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • ASA I-III
  • General anesthesia > 1 hour
  • Surgery under supine position with possibility of monitoring the neuromuscular block in both arms (thumbs)
  • Written informed content

排除标准

  • Neuromuscular disorders, hepatic and renal dysfunction
  • Medication expected to interfere with the neuromuscular blocking agent
  • Allergy to any medication used during anesthesia
  • Body weight less or exceeding 20% of the ideal body weight
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding

结局指标

主要结局

The precision of acceleromyography with and without preload during recovery

次要结局

  • Bias and limits of agreement for acceleromyography (AMG) with and without preload compared to mechanomyography (MMG) during recovery
  • All the following outcomes obtained with AMG with and without preload are compared to MMG. Furthermore the responses are compared when the AMG-values are "normalized":
  • Bias og limits of agreement between control TOF
  • Onset time
  • Time to reappearance of T1, T2, T3 and T4
  • Twitch height of T1 at reappearance of T1, T2, T3 and T4
  • Time to T1=25%
  • Interval 25-75%
  • Time to TOF-ratio = 0.9 and 1.0
  • Time to final T1
  • Time to final TOF ratio

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Performance of Acceleromyography With and Without... | 临床试验