CTRI/2021/10/037397尚未招募未知
comparative study of LMA Protector versus I-gel regarding oropharyngeal leak pressure and insertion time in short surgical procedures:A randomized controlled trial
Dr Sirsanu Saha0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •1.ASA Class I-II
- •2.BMI <25Kg/m2
- •3.Adequate airway anatomy
排除标准
- •1. Presence of upper airway anatomy
- •2. Full stomach
- •3.Hiatus hernia
- •4.H/O Stomach surgery
- •5.Head and neck surgery
- •6.Surgery requiring prone or lateral position
- •7.When post operative ventilator care is needed
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
4 期
A comparison between LMA protector and I-gel in adult patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesiaCTRI/2024/04/065055Amrita Institute of medical sciences and Research Institute
尚未招募
4 期
Comparison of two airway devices to see which is better to give anaesthesia in laparoscopic surgeriesCTRI/2024/02/063288Dr Aditi Suri
已完成
不适用
A comparison of the new laryngeal mask airway (LMA), LMA-Protector with the LMA-Supreme in surgical patients requiring airway management with an LMA.ACTRN12615000783527Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital100
尚未招募
3 期
Comparing I-gel versus LMA Proseal regarding airway management in controlled hypertensive patients.CTRI/2019/05/018929Tanuka Mandal
已完成
不适用
Comparison of performance of LMA Protector and LMA Proseal as airway management in anaesthetized paralyzed patientsCTRI/2022/02/040280il90