跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2018/03/012527
CTRI/2018/03/012527尚未招募不适用

Comparison of analgesic efficacy of Ultrasound Guided QuadratusLumborum Block (QL) versus Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block in children undergoing open pyeloplasty – Randomized Double Blinded Control

AIIMS New Delhi1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2018年1月5日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
60
试验地点
1
主要终点
Pain scores as measured by Modified Objective Pain Scale in first 24 hour after the surgery

研究概览

简要总结

Comparision of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided Quadratus Lumborum Block versus Erector Spinae Block in pediatric pyeloplasty

We hypothesize that ESP Block provides superior analgesia compared to QL Block due to its wider spread

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Participant and Investigator Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
1.00 Year(s) 至 6.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 1.ASA I & II
  • Elective Open Pyeloplasty.

排除标准

  • 1.Refusal by parents or guardians to participate in the study 2.Developmental delay and mental retardation 3.Coagulopathy 4.Infection at the puncture site 5.Significant cardiac, renal and liver diseases 6.Obesity.

结局指标

主要结局

Pain scores as measured by Modified Objective Pain Scale in first 24 hour after the surgery

时间窗: 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 hour after surgery

次要结局

  • Intraoperative fentanyl (rescue analgesia) requirements(Post operative fentanyl (rescue analgesia) requirements)

研究者

发起方
AIIMS New Delhi
申办方类型
Research institution and hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验