跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05609565
NCT05609565已完成4 期

Hybrid Anesthesia for Ambulatory Knee Arthroscopy Using Intrathecal Prilocaine and Adductor Canal Block vs Intrathecal Bupivacaine Alone: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Ain Shams University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 80 人开始时间: 2022年11月15日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
80
试验地点
1
主要终点
The duration of motor block (minutes)

研究概览

简要总结

  • Although bupivacaine is safe and has a low rate of transient neurologic symptoms, the prolonged sensory and motor block is a drawback for day-case spinal anesthesia.Intrathecal hyperbaric prilocaine causes a much shorter motor block, with a similar onset time and lower inter-individual variability in motor block duration. Furthermore, the peripheral nerve block is used as an adjunct to the spinal anesthesia to prolong the surgical anesthetic conditions.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Double (Participant, Care Provider)

入排标准

年龄范围
21 Years 至 60 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score I-II.
  • Body mass index < 35 kg/m2

排除标准

  • Patient's refusal.
  • Known coagulopathy.
  • Known peripheral neuropathy or neurological deficits.
  • Known allergy to study drugs.

研究组 & 干预措施

Group 1

Active Comparator

干预措施: spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric prilocaine+adductor canal block (ACB) with bupivacaine (Drug)

Group 2

Active Comparator

干预措施: spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

The duration of motor block (minutes)

时间窗: 24 hours postoperatively

The duration of motor block (minutes)

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Ibrahim Mamdouh Esmat

Assistant Professor of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain- shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

Ain Shams University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验