跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/02/081074
CTRI/2025/02/081074尚未招募不适用

A COMPARATIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY OF KINGVISION VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE, AIRTRAQ VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE AND MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE

K Koushik1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 90 人开始时间: 2025年3月3日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
90
试验地点
1
主要终点
Ease of Intubation using IDS score

研究概览

简要总结

A study titled "A comparative randomized controlled study of Kingvision video laryngoscope, Airtraq video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in adult patients scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia" was carried out in GGH, KADAPA during the period from January 2023 to December 2023.

Parameters such as ease of intubation based on Intubation difficulty score (IDS), duration of intubation, POGO score, changes in heart rate, mean arterial pressure, O2 saturation and incidence of airway trauma during laryngoscopy were noted.

In our study, MCLG and POGO score were better with Kingvision video laryngoscope and Airtraq video laryngoscope compared to Macintosh laryngoscope which was statistically significant. Number of attempts for intubation was comparable and was statistically insignificant. Alternative techniques for intubation like bougie insertion was needed for intubation in some patients with Macintosh laryngoscope.  Lifting force was more and laryngeal pressure  was applied in some patients intubated with Macintosh laryngoscope. IDS score was  better with Kingvision video laryngoscope and Airtraq video laryngoscope compared to Macintosh laryngoscope and was statistically significant. Time taken for intubation was lesser with Macintosh laryngoscope compared to Kingvision video laryngoscope and Airtraq video laryngoscope. Hemodynamic variability was lesser with Kingvision video laryngoscope and Airtraq video laryngoscope compared to Macintosh laryngoscope. Airway trauma was  observed in two patients intubated with Macintosh laryngoscope.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant and Investigator Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
20.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • ASA physical status I and II MPG Grade I and II BMI less than 25 kg/sq.m Patients posted for elective surgeries under GA.

排除标准

  • Patients with cervical spine injury Patients with anticipated difficult intubation.

结局指标

主要结局

Ease of Intubation using IDS score

时间窗: From insertion of laryngoscope beyond incisor teeth until successful intubation confirmed on capnography

次要结局

  • Duration of Intubation(From insertion of Laryngoscope beyond incisor teeth until successful intubation confirmed on capnography)
  • POGO score(During Intubation)
  • Hemodynamics(1 3 & 5 minutes after Intubation)
  • Airway trauma(During Intubation)

研究者

发起方
K Koushik
申办方类型
Other [self]
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Kethireddy koushik

Government Medical College, Kadapa

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验