ACTRN12619000397112招募中未知
High-flow nasal cannula versus standard oxygen therapy assisting sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in high risk cases: A randomised multicentre trial
The Queen Elizabeth Hopsital Anaesthesia Department0 个研究点目标入组 132 人开始时间: 2019年3月12日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 未知
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 132
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomised controlled trial
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Open (masking not used)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 o limit(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Adults (aged over 18 years) fulfilling any of these criteria: ASA 3, or 4, obesity (BMI above 30 kg/m2), obstructive sleep apnoea diagnosed by polysomnography, being treated with CPAP for OSA, or suspected OSA based on STOP BANG greater than or equal to 3
排除标准
- •1.Deemed difficult airway” and/or difficult intubation based on clinical judgement and known previous difficult airway.
- •2.Severe cardio-respiratory compromise or any other indications that warrant the procedure to be done under general anaesthesia with endotracheal tube.
- •3.Patients judged at significant risk of pulmonary aspiration. Risk assessment will be based on patient history (focussing particularly on risk factors for aspiration) and physical examination. Possible risk factors for aspiration include:
- •a)Increased gastric content, delayed gastric emptying, including lap band in situ, lack of fasting (less than six hours’ solids and two hours for clear fluid).
- •b)Increased regurgitation risk: Uncontrolled or symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux, oesophageal strictures, Zenker Diverticulum and achalasia.
- •c)Laryngeal incompetence: may be due to cerebral infarct, head injuries, neuromuscular disorders (Parkinson’s disease, Gullian Barre), muscular dystrophies (cerebral palsy, cranial neuropathies).
- •4.Emergency surgery and any other criteria warranting general anaesthesia with ETT.
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
不适用
Comparison of the effects on blood oxygen level between two delivery of oxygen methods during long endoscopic proceduresACTRN12620000931976Austin Health300
已完成
4 期
High flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in children with respiratory distressInfants and children with respiratory distressHFNC,Conventional oxygen therapy,respiratory distressTCTR20170222007Rachada Pisek Sompotch177
已完成
不适用
High-flow nasal oxygen cannula versus conventional oxygen therapy in patients with acute dyspnea and hypoxemia in emergency roomPatients presenting with acute dyspnea and hypoxemia in an emergency roomDyspneaEmergency roomOxygen therapyHypoxemiaTCTR20140618002Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital40
尚未招募
不适用
The use of headbox oxygen versus high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for neonatal respiratory distress in non-tertiary hospitalsRespiratory distressBreathing supportRespiratory - Other respiratory disorders / diseasesReproductive Health and Childbirth - Complications of newbornACTRN12611000233921niversity of Newcastle520
已完成
不适用
Comparison of effect of 2 methods of giving oxygen: at high flow rate vs traditional oxygen delivery to obese patients after fastrack (surgery with fast recovery) heart surgery with on atelectasis (air sacs of lung do not fill with air) in which the patients will be randomly divided into groupsCTRI/2022/05/042678King Georges Medical University
